A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

MutagenPred-GCNNs: A Graph Convolutional Neural Network-Based Classification Model for Mutagenicity Prediction with Data-Driven Molecular Fingerprints. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

An important task in the early stage of drug discovery is the identification of mutagenic compounds. Mutagenicity prediction models that can interpret relationships between toxicological endpoints and compound structures are especially favorable. In this research, we used an advanced graph convolutional neural network (GCNN) architecture to identify the molecular representation and develop predictive models based on these representations. The predictive model based on features extracted by GCNNs can not only predict the mutagenicity of compounds but also identify the structure alerts in compounds. In fivefold cross-validation and external validation, the highest area under the curve was 0.8782 and 0.8382, respectively; the highest accuracy (Q) was 80.98% and 76.63%, respectively; the highest sensitivity was 83.27% and 78.92%, respectively; and the highest specificity was 78.83% and 76.32%, respectively. Additionally, our model also identified some toxicophores, such as aromatic nitro, three-membered heterocycles, quinones, and nitrogen and sulfur mustard. These results indicate that GCNNs could learn the features of mutagens effectively. In summary, we developed a mutagenicity classification model with high predictive performance and interpretability based on a data-driven molecular representation trained through GCNNs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12539-020-00407-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

graph convolutional
8
convolutional neural
8
classification model
8
mutagenicity prediction
8
data-driven molecular
8
molecular representation
8
mutagenpred-gcnns graph
4
neural network-based
4
network-based classification
4
model
4

Similar Publications