A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Deep learning-based classification of lower extremity arterial stenosis in computed tomography angiography. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a deep learning model to assist radiologists in classifying lower extremity arteries based on the degree of arterial stenosis caused by plaque in lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) of patients with peripheral artery disease.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 265 patients who underwent lower-extremity CTA between January 1, 2016 and October 31, 2019 were selected. A total of 17050 axial images of iliac, femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal artery from these patients were used for the training and validation of the parallel efficient network (p-EffNet), a kind of supervised convolutional neural network, to classify the lower-extremity artery segments according to the degree of stenosis with digital subtraction angiography as reference standard. The classification results of the p-EffNet were then compared with those obtained from radiologists. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the performance of the p-EffNet and accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and area under the curve (AUC) were used as measure metrics to compare the performance of the p-EffNet and that of radiologists.

Results: The p-EffNet exhibited a good performance of 91.5 % accuracy, 0.987 AUC and 90.2 % sensitivity and 97.7 % specificity in classifying above-knee artery and 90.9 % accuracy, 0.981 AUC, 91.3 % sensitivity and 95.2 % specificity in classifying below-knee artery. When compared with human readers, for both above-knee and below-knee artery, the p-EffNet had comparable accuracy (p = 0.266 and p = 0.808, respectively) and specificity (p = 0.118 and p = 0.971, respectively) but lower sensitivity (p < 0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively).

Conclusions: The p-EffNet demonstrates promising diagnostic performance and has the potential to reduce the workload of radiologists and help to find the plaques that might otherwise have been missed or misjudged.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109528DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lower extremity
12
arterial stenosis
8
computed tomography
8
tomography angiography
8
performance p-effnet
8
specificity classifying
8
below-knee artery
8
artery
6
p-effnet
6
deep learning-based
4

Similar Publications