Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) with guide sheath (GS) is an effective procedure for diagnosing small peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) (≤20 mm in the largest diameter). However, samples obtained using EBUS-TBB with GS are small, and the diagnostic yield of small PPLs biopsied using EBUS-TBB with GS is unsatisfactory.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of small PPLs using EBUS-TBB without GS compared to that with GS.
Materials And Methods: Between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015, 276 consecutive lesions were biopsied using EBUS-TBB with GS or without GS. We retrospectively compared EBUS-TBB with and without GS in terms of the diagnostic yield and complications related to small PPLs (≤20 mm).
Results: Of the 276 lesions who underwent EBUS-TBB with or without GS, we identified 80 lesions with small PPLs (≤20 mm). Sixty-two lesions were successfully diagnosed by EBUS-TBB (77.5%, diagnostic yield). The diagnostic yield of PPLs using EBUS-TBB without GS was not significantly higher than that using EBUS-TBB with GS (34/41 = 82.9% and 28/39 = 71.7%, respectively; p = 0.233). However, according to size (≤15 mm or > 15 mm), location (upper, middle/lingular, or lower area), and structure (solid nodule or ground-glass opacity), the diagnostic yield of small PPLs (≤15 mm) using EBUS-TBB without GS was significantly higher than with GS (21/26 = 80.7% vs. 8/16 = 50.0%, p = 0.036). There were no complications among the two groups.
Conclusions: EBUS-TBB without GS is an effective and safe procedure for diagnosing small PPLs (≤15 mm) compared to that with GS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13324 | DOI Listing |