Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a new subxiphoid hybrid epicardial-endocardial atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation approach for the treatment of persistent AF.

Background: Surgical hybrid ablation procedures have shown promise for maintaining sinus rhythm versus catheter ablation but are associated with increased periprocedural adverse events.

Methods: Patients with symptomatic persistent AF (n = 33, mean age 64 ± 9 years, 25 men) who had antiarrhythmic drug therapy or prior catheter ablation was unsuccessful were referred for hybrid epicardial-endocardial AF ablation and LAA exclusion. LAA closure was confirmed by transesophageal echocardiographic Doppler flow and/or computed tomographic angiography 1 to 3 months post-ligation. The incidence of atrial tachycardia or AF recurrence, LAA closure, thromboembolic events, and post-operative complications were assessed.

Results: All 33 patients underwent successful LAA ligation with epicardial ablation of the posterior left atrial wall, as well as endocardial pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Freedom from atrial tachycardia or AF was 91% (20 of 22 patients) at 6 months, 90% (18 of 20 patients) at 12 months, 92% (11 of 12 patients) at 18 months, and 92% (11 of 12) at 24 months. There were no acute periprocedural complications (<7 days). Thirty-day adverse events included 2 patients with pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis and 1 incisional hernia repair. There were no long-term complications, strokes, or deaths. LAA ligation was complete in 27 of 33 subjects (82%), with 6 subjects having leaks of <5 mm.

Conclusions: Subxiphoid hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation with LAA ligation is feasible, safe, and effective. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these initial findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.06.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hybrid epicardial-endocardial
12
subxiphoid hybrid
8
epicardial-endocardial atrial
8
atrial fibrillation
8
ablation
8
fibrillation ablation
8
left atrial
8
laa ligation
8
catheter ablation
8
laa closure
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: The CEASE-AF trial demonstrated that epicardial-endocardial hybrid ablation (HA) had superior effectiveness compared to endocardial catheter ablation (CA) for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), without significantly increasing major complications during a 12-month period. Most contemporary AF ablation trials have not evaluated durability beyond 12 months. Therefore, 24-month effectiveness and safety of HA and CA are compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, which significantly contributes to morbidity, mortality, and a diminished quality of life. Despite advancements in pharmacological treatments, many AF patients do not achieve adequate symptom control with oral medications. This network meta-analysis seeks to provide comprehensive evidence to guide clinical decision-making and optimize ablation strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The CONVERGE trial demonstrated that hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation was more effective than catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) at 1 year. Long-term real-world outcome data are scarce.

Objective: We described a single-center experience by evaluating the long-term effectiveness and safety of hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study compares the effectiveness of hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation (HA) to standard endocardial catheter ablation (CA) for patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF/LSPAF), suggesting HA may offer better long-term results.
  • The CEASE-AF trial enrolled participants across nine European countries, focusing on those with symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation and specific heart size measurements, making it a randomized controlled study.
  • Results showed that 71.6% of patients in the HA group achieved freedom from significant arrhythmias after 12 months, compared to only 39.2% in the CA group, indicating a substantial improvement in effectiveness with HA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Favorable clinical outcomes are difficult to achieve in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) with catheter ablation (CA). The CONVERGE (Convergence of Epicardial and Endocardial Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Persistent Atrial FIbrillation) trial evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid convergent (HC) ablation vs endocardial CA.

Objective: The study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HC vs CA in the LSPAF subgroup from the CONVERGE trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF