98%
921
2 minutes
20
Functional brain markers that can inform research on brain abnormalities, and especially those ready to facilitate clinical work on such abnormalities, will need to show not only considerable sensitivity and specificity but enough consistency with respect to developmental course that their validity in individual cases can be trusted. A challenge to establishing such markers may be individual differences in developmental course. The present study examined auditory cortex activity in children at an age when developmental changes to the auditory cortex 50 ms (M50) and 100 ms (M100) components are prominent to better understand the use of auditory markers in pediatric clinical research. MEG auditory encoding measures (auditory evoked fields in response to pure tone stimuli) were obtained from 15 typically developing children 6-8 years old, with measures repeated 18 and 36 months after the initial exam. MEG analyses were conducted in source space (i.e., brain location), with M50 and M100 sources identified in left and right primary/secondary auditory cortex (Heschl's gyrus). A left and right M50 response was observed at all times (Time 1, Time 2, Time 3), with M50 latency (collapsing across hemisphere) at Time 3 (77 ms) 10 ms earlier than Time 1 (87 ms; < 0.001) and with M50 responses on average (collapsing across time) 5 ms earlier in the right (80 ms) than left hemisphere (85 ms; < 0.05). In the majority of children, however, M50 latency changes were not constant across the three-year period; for example, whereas in some children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 1 to Time 2, in other children a ~10 ms latency reduction was observed from Time 2 to Time 3. M100 responses were defined by a significant "peak" of detected power with magnetic field topography opposite M50 and occurring 50-100 ms later than the M50. Although M100s were observed in a few children at Time 1 and Time 2 (and more often in the right than left hemisphere), M100s were not observed in the majority of children except in the right hemisphere at Time 3. In sum, longitudinal findings showed large between- and within-subject variability in rate of change as well as time to reach neural developmental milestones (e.g., presence of a detectable M100 response). Findings also demonstrated the need to examine whole-brain activity, given hemisphere differences in the rate of auditory cortex maturation. Pediatric research will need to take such normal variability into account when seeking clinical auditory markers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717950 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584557 | DOI Listing |
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
September 2025
Objective: Transcranial ultrasound (US) stimulation (TUS) has emerged as a promising technique for minimally invasive, localized, deep brain stimulation. However, indirect auditory effects during neuromodulation require careful consideration, particularly in experiments with rodents. One method to prevent auditory responses involves applying tapered envelopes to US bursts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Behav Neurosci
August 2025
Department of Sensory and Cognitive Physiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Sound influences motor functions and sound perception is conversely modulated by locomotion. Accumulating evidence supports an interconnection between the auditory system and the basal ganglia (BG), which has functional implications on the interaction between the two systems. Substantial evidence now supports auditory cortex and auditory thalamus inputs to the tri-laminar region of the tail of the striatum (tTS) in rodents.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin EEG Neurosci
September 2025
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
ObjectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to identify electrophysiological markers distinguishing stages of development, stability, and early aging in cortical auditory processing to elucidate neurophysiological changes in healthy auditory aging.MethodsWe evaluated 149 healthy participants (both sexes; aged 7-59 years) recruited from the general community via electronic media, posters, radio, and regional television, divided into six age groups (7-11, 12-17, 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, and 50-59 years). Eligibility criteria included normal hearing, no neurological disorders, and normal otoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFbioRxiv
August 2025
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Sound harmonicity is foundational in complex auditory stimuli like music and vocalizations but it remains unclear how such spectrally complex stimuli are processed in the auditory cortex (ACtx). Subregions of the auditory cortex process are thought to process harmonic stimuli differently, and secondary ACtx (A2) layer (L) 2/3 is believed to be the most selective. Selective responses to sound features in ACtx are thought to emerge hierarchically starting from A1 L4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeural population activity is often stereotyped into recurring activity patterns, i.e., neural motifs, which can be seen as the fundamental building blocks in sensory processing and cognition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF