A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A Study to Evaluate the Need for Comminution in the Preparation of Food Materials for Testing of Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus Species, and Generic Escherichia coli. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Comminution reduces the sampling error arising from distributional heterogeneity of the target contaminant/target analyte in the material, facilitating the selection of a more representative test portion. A laboratory sampling method incorporating comminution prior to selection of the test portion (Sampling Method B) was compared to current sampling methods that used no comminution step (Sampling Method A).

Objective: This required the development of an efficient process for comminution of food samples prior to removal of the test portion for the detection and isolation of Listeria monocytogenes and the enumeration of Staphylococcus species and Escherichia coli.

Method: From December 2016 to December 2017, 2742 tests were conducted on 778 unique food samples. For all food samples, a test portion (TPA) was first removed using Sampling Method A, and then the remainder of the material was comminuted and a second test portion (TPB) was removed using Sampling Method B and tested alongside the first portion.

Results: Across all food matrices and microbial targets, 17 additional targets were detected using only Sampling Method B, and positive detections of target analytes increased by 77% using Sampling Method B from the test portions taken using Sampling Method A.

Conclusion: Utilizing a sample preparation method that includes a comminution step resulted in an increased number of pathogen detections.

Highlights: The introduction of a comminution step in the preparation of food samples for detection of three common microbial contaminants resulted in an increase in the rate of detection of natural contaminates in a variety of ready to eat foods. An efficient aseptic process for commutation that can be adapted to a wide range of laboratory settings was identified.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa074DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sampling method
32
test portion
20
food samples
16
comminution step
12
sampling
10
method
9
preparation food
8
listeria monocytogenes
8
staphylococcus species
8
removed sampling
8

Similar Publications