Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs) have been increasingly performed in recent years. However, the majority of MILRs are actually minor or limited resections of peripheral lesions. Due to the technical complexity major hepatectomies remain challenging for minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the short and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive right hepatectomies (MIRHs) with contemporary patients undergoing open right hepatectomies (ORHs) METHODS: Consecutive patients submitted to anatomic right hepatectomies between January 2013 and December 2018 in two tertiary referral centers were studied. Study groups were compared on an intention-to-treat basis after propensity score matching (PSM). Overall survival (OS) analyses were performed for the entire cohort and specific etiologies subgroups RESULTS: During study period 178 right hepatectomies were performed. After matching, 37 patients were included in MIRH group and 60 in ORH group. The groups were homogenous for all baseline characteristics. MIRHs had significant lower blood loss (400 ml vs. 500 ml, P = 0.01), lower rate of minor complications (13.5% vs. 35%, P = 0.03) and larger resection margins (10 mm vs. 5 mm, P = 0.03) when compared to ORHs. Additionally, a non-significant decrease in hospital stay (ORH 9 days vs. MIRH 7 days, P = 0.09) was observed. No differences regarding the use of Pringle's maneuver, operative time, overall morbidity or perioperative mortality were observed. OS was similar between the groups (P = 0.13). Similarly, no difference in OS was found in subgroups of patients with primary liver tumors (P = 0.09) and liver metastasis (P = 0.80).

Conclusions: MIRHs are feasible and safe in experienced hands. Minimally invasive approach was associated with less blood loss, a significant reduction in minor perioperative complications, and did not negatively affect long-term outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602349PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00919-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

minimally invasive
20
propensity score
8
score matching
8
long-term outcomes
8
patients undergoing
8
blood loss
8
minimally
5
hepatectomies
5
patients
5
invasive versus
4

Similar Publications

Background: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by robotic surgery is a safe and feasible surgical technique. Currently, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy represents an alternative to the classical distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, in the case of benign and low-grade malignant diseases of the body or pancreas tail. The reasons for preserving the spleen are based on the reduction of postoperative complications, such as post-splenectomy infections, subphrenic abscess, portal thrombosis, pulmonary hypertension, thrombocytosis, and thromboembolism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robotic surgery has transformed the field of surgery, offering enhanced precision, minimal invasiveness, and improved patient outcomes. This narrative review explores the multifaceted aspects of robotic surgery, examining the challenges, recent advances, and future prospects for its integration into healthcare. Our comprehensive analysis of 48 studies reveals significant geographic disparities in robotic surgery research and implementation, with 68.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This meta-analysis compares thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF).

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to April 2025 for studies comparing thoracoscopic versus conventional thoracotomy approaches. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using appropriate tools.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Long-term complications in patients with bladder-prostate rhabdomyosarcoma treated with brachytherapy: a systematic review.

Pediatr Surg Int

September 2025

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Via Nicolò Giustiniani, 35100, Padua, Italy.

Introduction: Brachytherapy has been used for the multimodal treatment of pediatric bladder-prostate rhabdomyosarcoma in the last two decades. The aim of this systematic review is to gather the current evidence about this innovative technique with a special focus on long-term outcomes.

Methods: According to PRISMA criteria, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for papers published between 2000 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Biliodigestive anastomosis: technique and outcome].

Chirurgie (Heidelb)

September 2025

Klink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.

The biliodigestive anastomosis represents a core element of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. It requires a precise surgical technique and detailed knowledge of biliary anatomy and vascular supply. A tension-free suture, sufficient perfusion of the anastomosed structures and an exact mucosa-to-mucosa adaptation using delicate absorbable suture material are decisive for a successful construction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF