Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: To date, corticosteroids remain the cornerstone treatment of ocular involvement of GCA, and no other treatment has proven to be effective in this setting. We herein report on a unique case of GCA with ocular involvement worsening despite high dose corticosteroids and recovering with intravenous iloprost.
Case Report: A 70-year-old man presented with acute vision loss in his left eye related to anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. The diagnosis of giant-cell arteritis was confirmed by a temporal artery biopsy. Despite intravenous pulse methylprednisolone for 3 days then oral prednisone at 60 mg/day, the patient developed from day 5 fluctuating vision loss in the right eye, related to ocular ischemia by occlusion of the ophthalmic artery, and responsive to hyperhydration. Iloprost, an analog of prostacyclin PGI2, was then administered intravenously for 5 days and resulted in a stable improvement in visual acuity in the right eye.
Conclusion: This case highlights the potential role of vasodilatator agents in giant cell arteritis with ocular involvement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2020.1802489 | DOI Listing |