Article Synopsis

  • The belief in conspiracy theories may not simply stem from a perceived lack of control, despite common assumptions.
  • Findings from six online studies indicate that manipulating control doesn't change conspiracy beliefs, even while correlations between the two persist.
  • The research suggests that conspiracy theories might not help people cope with feelings of lost control, highlighting discrepancies between different types of evidence and acknowledging study limitations.

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

It is widely believed that conspiracy theory beliefs are the product of perceived lack of control. However, to date there is mixed evidence, at best, to support this claim. We consider the reasons why conspiracy theory beliefs do not appear to be based in any straightforward way on control beliefs, interrogating existing findings and presenting new data that call the relationship into question. Across six studies conducted online using MTurk samples, we observed no effect of control manipulations on conspiracy theory beliefs, while replicating previously reported correlational evidence of their association. The results suggest that conspiracy beliefs are not suitable for compensating for threats to control. We discuss possible reasons for the discrepancy between experimental and correlational effects and examine the limitations of the studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430734PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237771PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conspiracy theory
16
theory beliefs
12
perceived lack
8
lack control
8
online mturk
8
control
5
conspiracy
5
beliefs
5
control lead
4
lead conspiracy
4

Similar Publications

Prebunking can be used to pre-emptively refute conspiracy narratives. We developed a new approach to prebunking - fighting fire with fire - which introduces a plausible 'meta-conspiracy' suggesting that conspiracy theories are deliberately spread as part of a wider conspiracy. In two preregistered intervention studies, prebunking specific COVID-19 vaccine (Study 1, N = 720) and climate change (Study 2, N = 1077) conspiracy theories (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The exact details of the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing Covid-19, remain unknown. Scientific publications using data available to date point to a natural origin linked to the wildlife trade at a market in Wuhan, China. Yet, theories postulating a research-related origin of SARS-CoV-2 abound, and currently dominate the public discussion of the origin of the Covid-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted older adults, generating widespread online discussions that revealed how this at-risk population was perceived. Understanding these portrayals is essential, as public discourse influences societal perceptions of aging and impacts policies and practices affecting older adults. Past research highlights that ageist stereotypes and attitudes frequently surface in public discussions, shaping the experiences of older individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The COVID-19 pandemic has fueled numerous conspiracy theories that have reinvigorated prejudices and stereotypes toward marginalized groups. While much current research focuses on the correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, the consequences of conspiracy narratives for outgroup attitudes are rarely examined. Across two studies, we investigate the relationship between COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and attitudes toward ethnic minorities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quasi-universal acceptance of basic science in the United States.

Public Underst Sci

September 2025

Institut Jean Nicod, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS, France.

Substantial minorities of the population report a low degree of trust in science, or endorse conspiracy theories that violate basic scientific knowledge. This might indicate a wholesale rejection of science. In four studies, we asked 782 US participants questions about trust in science, conspiracy beliefs, and basic science (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF