98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To determine whether robotic ventral hernia repair is associated with fewer days in the hospital 90 days after surgery compared with laparoscopic repair.
Design: Pragmatic, blinded randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Multidisciplinary hernia clinics in Houston, USA.
Participants: 124 patients, deemed appropriate candidates for elective minimally invasive ventral hernia repair, consecutively presenting from April 2018 to February 2019.
Interventions: Robotic ventral hernia repair (n=65) versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (n=59).
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was number of days in hospital within 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, operating room time, wound complications, hernia recurrence, reoperation, abdominal wall quality of life, and costs from the healthcare system perspective. Outcomes were pre-specified before data collection began and analyzed as intention to treat.
Results: Patients from both groups were similar at baseline. Ninety day follow-up was completed in 123 (99%) patients. No evidence was seen of a difference in days in hospital between the two groups (median 0 0 days; relative rate 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 2.19; P=0.82). For secondary outcomes, no differences were noted in emergency department visits, wound complications, hernia recurrence, or reoperation. However, robotic repair had longer operative duration (141 77 min; mean difference 62.89, 45.75 to 80.01; P≤0.001) and increased healthcare costs ($15 865 (£12 746; €14 125) $12 955; cost ratio 1.21, 1.07 to 1.38; adjusted absolute cost difference $2767, $910 to $4626; P=0.004). Among patients with robotic ventral hernia repair, two had an enterotomy compared none with laparoscopic repair. The median one month postoperative improvement in abdominal wall quality of life was 3 with robotic ventral hernia repair compared with 15 following laparoscopic repair.
Conclusion: This study found no evidence of a difference in 90 day postoperative hospital days between robotic and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. However, robotic repair increased operative duration and healthcare costs.
Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03490266.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359869 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2457 | DOI Listing |
Ann Afr Med
September 2025
Department of General Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Background: Ventral hernias, particularly umbilical hernias, are the second most common type of abdominal wall hernias after inguinal hernias. Surgical intervention using mesh placement has become standard due to its effectiveness in reducing recurrence. Among mesh techniques, the sublay approach is widely practiced through both open and laparoscopic methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHernia
September 2025
Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Herlev, DK-2730, Denmark.
Purpose: Primary ventral hernia repair is a common elective procedure; however, mesh placement practices vary widely, and there is limited evidence to guide optimal placement. This international study examined surgeons' preferences and considerations regarding mesh placement in elective primary ventral hernia repair.
Methods: We conducted an international cross-sectional survey targeting surgeons experienced in primary ventral hernia repair.
JSLS
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka City, Japan. (Drs. Toma, Fujii, and Eguchi).
Backgrounds And Objectives: The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) has gained popularity as a novel minimally invasive ventral hernia repair approach. However, this procedure becomes technically demanding once the view is no longer maintained, due to incidental pneumoperitoneum caused by peritoneal injury during the surgery. In an attempt to overcome this technical issue, we report laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair with upfront coring out of hernia defect (LERCO) where the intraperitoneal coring out of the hernia defect precedes the regular eTEP for the treatment of midline incisional ventral hernia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland.
BACKGROUND Chest wall hernia and residual pleural space are known complications after thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection. Some risk factors for chest wall hernia have been described; however, residual pleural space has never been described as one of them. We present 2 cases suggesting that postoperative residual air space can represent a newly identified risk factor for chest wall hernia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
September 2025
Montefiore Medical Center, New York, United States.
This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) versus the robotic retromuscular (RM) techniques and their respective outcomes for small and medium-sized ventral hernia repair. A comprehensive online search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies comparing laparoscopic IPOM to robotic RM techniques were included.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF