Knowledge acquisition and retention after a high flow training programme in Peru: a quasi-experimental single group pre-post design.

Objective: Respiratory infections remain the leading infectious cause of death in children under 5 and disproportionately affect children in resource-limited settings. Implementing non-invasive respiratory support can reduce respiratory-related mortality. However, maintaining competency after deployment can be difficult. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive multidisciplinary high-flow training programme in a Peruvian paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Design: Quasi-experimental single group pre-post intervention study design.

Setting: Quaternary care PICU in a resource-constrained setting in Lima, Peru.

Participants: Attending physicians, fellows, paediatric residents, registered nurses, respiratory therapists and medical technicians working in the PICU were invited to participate.

Interventions: Concurrent with initial high-flow deployment, we implemented a training programme consisting of lectures, case-based discussion and demonstrations with baseline, 3-month and 12-month training sessions. Pre-training and post-training assessment surveys were distributed surrounding all training sessions.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was achieving minimum competency (median score of 80%) on the high flow training assessment tool. Secondary outcomes included knowledge acquisition (differences in pre-baseline and post-baseline training assessments), short-term retention (differences in post-baseline and pre-3-month refresher training assessments) and long-term retention (differences in post-3-month refresher and pre-12-month refresher training assessments).

Results: Eighty participants (50% nurses, 15% ICU physicians and 34% other providers) completed the baseline assessment. Participants showed improvement in overall score and all subtopics except the clinical application of knowledge after baseline training (p<0.001). Participants failed to retain minimum competency at 3-month and 12-month follow-up assessments (70% (IQR: 57-74) and 70% (IQR: 65-74), respectively). After repeat training sessions, overall knowledge continued to improve, exceeding baseline performance (78% (IQR: 70-87), 83% (IQR: 74-87) and 87% (IQR: 83-91) at baseline, 3 and 12 months, respectively).

Conclusion: This study suggests the need for repeat training sessions to achieve and maintain competency after the implementation of new technology.