Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

. To determine the 5-year success rate of the "all-inside" technique of arthroscopic meniscus suture and collagen membrane wrapping along with bone marrow blood injection, to evaluate the progression of degenerative changes and the impact of simultaneous anteriro cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. . Fifty-four consecutive patients with complex meniscal tears were treated with the previously described technique. The subjective scores (International Knee Documentation Committee 2000, Lysholm, EQ-5D-5L) and Barret clinical criteria of meniscal healing were recorded. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were assessed at 2 and 5 years postoperatively, using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed in order to assess the survivorship after the index procedure. Thirty-nine patients were divided into 2 groups: group A-isolated meniscus repair and group B-meniscus repair with concurrent ACL reconstruction. . Fifty-four patients were treated and 44 were available for analysis. There was a statistically significant improvement in subjective scores and clinical assessment between the preoperative, 2-year follow-up, and 5-year follow-up time points. EQ-5D-5L utility value was 0.9 ± 1 at final follow-up. The WORMS osteoarthritis severity grade had increased from 6.9 ± 5.0 points at the 2-year follow-up to 11.1 ± 9.6 points at the 5-year follow-up ( < 0.001). There was a significant difference between the groups after 60 months. The overall survival rate at final follow-up was 88%. . The treatment option evaluated in this study has shown very good mid-term clinical and MRI-based outcomes as well as a favorable survival rate. Simultaneous ACL reconstruction is likely a factor for osteoarthritis progression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808947PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603520924762DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acl reconstruction
12
tears treated
8
wrapping bone
8
bone marrow
8
marrow blood
8
blood injection
8
reconstruction fifty-four
8
subjective scores
8
magnetic resonance
8
2-year follow-up
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) leads to high rates of knee post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Physical activity may mitigate PTOA risk but levels after ACLR have not been extensively studied. We aimed to review self-reported and device-measured physical activity levels in individuals with ACLR and compare them with international guidelines, and with uninjured controls.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of Kaplan fibres (KF), anterolateral ligament (ALL) and lateral meniscus (LM) injuries on preoperative anterolateral rotational instability (ALRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees. It was hypothesised that injuries to the ALC (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus ACLR + lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) at mid-term follow-up in a low activity population based on the Tegner activity scale (TAS ≤ 4).

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis comparing patients with a pre-injury TAS ≤ 4 who underwent primary isolated ACLR versus ACLR + LEAPs between 2012 and 2022. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, and presence of meniscal injury was used to establish two groups: ACLR alone and ACLR with LEAP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Modifying interference screw composition may ensure better osteoconductive properties in order to reduce tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The primary and secondary purposes were to evaluate tunnel and screw volume changes in poly-L-lactide acid (PLLA) and poly-D-lactic acid + hydroxyapatite + β-tricalcium phosphate (PLDLA+) screws. The tertiary purpose was to compare patient reported- and functional outcomes between PLLA and PLDLA+ group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF