A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Utility of Routine Preoperative F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in Identifying Pathological Lymph Node Metastases at Radical Cystectomy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: We determined the diagnostic performance of F-FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for detecting nodal metastases in patients with muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer before radical cystectomy.

Materials And Methods: Preoperative F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography scans (208) were retrospectively reviewed. Scans were routinely performed in 185 patients with muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer between August 2012 and February 2017, all of whom underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Analyses were stratified by clinical node involvement and chemotherapy status. The diagnostic performance of F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography was assessed according to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

Results: Lymph node metastases at time of pelvic lymph node dissection were present in 21.8% of those without suspicious nodes on computerized tomography (clinically node negative) and 52.6% of those with suspicious nodes on computerized tomography (clinically node positive). Median metastatic focus size was 5 mm. In clinically node negative cases F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography rarely detected nodal metastases (sensitivity 7% to 23%). In clinically node positive cases negative F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography was useful in ruling out lymph node metastases (sensitivity 92% to 100%). This study was limited by its mixed population and focus on pelvic nodal metastases only.

Conclusions: F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography appears to be most useful for better characterization of enlarged nodes identified by computerized tomography. Routine preoperative F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography has limited utility in clinically node negative cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477436PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positron emission
32
emission tomography/computerized
32
tomography/computerized tomography
32
f-fdg positron
24
lymph node
20
clinically node
20
node metastases
12
nodal metastases
12
computerized tomography
12
node negative
12

Similar Publications