98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction offers excellent aesthetic results with less pain and elimination of animation deformity due to avoidance of pectoralis dissection and subpectoral implant placement. Concerns about the effects of prostheses on flap perfusion have limited use of the technique to highly selected patients. We present a series of "suboptimal" patients that have undergone immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction utilizing an air-filled "spacer" implant.
Methods: A single surgeon's experience with immediate, single-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction using a Spectrum implant was retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, adjuvant therapies, risk factors for threatened flaps, and complications, including those that required subsequent intervention, were evaluated.
Results: Twenty-five patients (39 breasts) underwent immediate prepectoral reconstruction with a Spectrum implant. Ten patients had minor complications, 6 of whom required intervention with successful correction. There was a single case of implant loss in the series; this patient had prior radiation.
Conclusions: Utilizing the spacer concept, immediate single-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction is a viable alternative to subpectoral implant placement or delay procedures. The technique delivers aesthetic results with less postoperative pain, quicker operative times, and avoidance of animation deformity. It can be considered for any patient, including high-risk patients such as those with radiation exposure, thin/threatened skin flaps, significant ptosis, and obesity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6846304 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002470 | DOI Listing |
Ann Plast Surg
September 2025
From the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center-College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN.
Introduction: Implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy remains one of the most frequently used methods of breast reconstruction in the US. Patients with large, ptotic breasts often face poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that implant-based breast reconstruction with auto-augmentation techniques can minimize problems with acellular dermal matrices (ADM) by using less, and providing the benefit of prepectoral placement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pers Med
August 2025
Austin-Weston Center for Cosmetic Surgery, 1825 Samuel Morse Dr., Reston, VA 20190, USA.
: In the search for optimal meshes and matrices in breast surgery, poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) has emerged as a promising alternative. This review evaluates the clinical application of P4HB scaffolds, focusing on complication rates and surgical outcomes. : A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and ScienceDirect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Surg Protoc
September 2025
Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States.
Background: Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has become a widely accepted approach for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Traditionally, implants were placed in the subpectoral (SP) plane to maximize soft tissue coverage; however, recent advances in surgical technique and implant materials, such as acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and meshes, have led to a resurgence in the prepectoral (PP) approach. Recent studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding their respective complication profiles and patient-reported outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReports (MDPI)
July 2025
Department of Anatomy, Histology, Embriology, Pathology Anatomy and Pathology Histology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.
: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy is a critical aspect of treatment for many patients, offering both physical and psychological benefits. Traditional methods include autologous tissue flaps and implants, with implant-based techniques being the most prevalent in the Western world. However, complications such as capsular contracture remain a concern.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAesthetic Plast Surg
August 2025
UO Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS - Università Cattolica del "Sacro Cuore" - Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Background: Increasingly popular, prepectoral breast reconstruction preserves the pectoralis major muscle's anatomy and function. Although polyurethane-coated implants in this context have yielded encouraging results, their interplay with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is not well-documented, particularly considering PMRT's known adverse effects on implant-based reconstructions. The study aimed to evaluate the aesthetic outcomes and radiation therapy (RT) damage in patients undergoing prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants receiving PMRT, as well as the influence of mastectomy flap thickness on RT side effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF