98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The role of multiple respiratory viruses in bronchiolitis treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has not been thoroughly investigated. We evaluated the contribution of coinfection on clinical course of bronchiolitis treated with HFNC and on response to this treatment.
Methods: We selected 120 children with bronchiolitis, younger than 12 months, admitted to Emergency Department between 2016 and 2018 and treated with HFNC. We compared single and multiple virus infections in relation to specific outcomes such as the clinical response to HFNC and the HFNC failure. The multiple virus infection was defined by the detection of 2 or more viruses in nasopharyngeal aspirates. The HFNC failure was defined as escalation to higher level of care, including Helmet-Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, invasive ventilation or transfer to pediatric intensive care unit within 48 hours from the time of HFNC initiation. We also performed a comparison between HFNC failure and HFNC not-failure groups according to the number of virus and the type of virus.
Results: The severity score post-HFNC initiation was significantly associated with coinfection [odds ratio (OR): 1.361; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.036-1.786; P = 0.027]. The likelihood of coinfection decreased by 23.1% for each increase of saturation O2 after HFNC initiation (OR: 0.769; 95% CI: 0.609-0.972; P = 0.028). Atelectasis was more likely to occur in coinfection (OR: 2.923; 95% CI: 1.049-8.148; P = 0.04). The duration of HFNC treatment increased significantly in coinfection (OR: 1.018; 95% CI: 1.006-1.029; P = 0.002). No significant differences were described between HFNC failure and the number and the type of detected viruses.
Conclusions: The detection of multiple viruses and the type of virus did not influence the HFNC failure, although the coinfection was associated with a deterioration of severity score, a longer HFNC treatment and a major presence of atelectasis. The role of coinfection on HFNC treatment might subtend a complex interplay between multiple viruses and host susceptibility.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000002512 | DOI Listing |
BMC Pulm Med
August 2025
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, direct comparative evidence on the clinical efficacy of HFNC versus NIV in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) remains limited and inconclusive.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HFNC and NIV in AECOPD patients.
BMC Anesthesiol
August 2025
Pulmonology Department, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8/2, Trubetskaya Str, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Background: High-flow nasal cannula is widespread in patients with hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure, but physiological data concerning influence of the combination of breathing pattern, preset flow rate (PFR), and inspiratory oxygen fraction (FO) on end-expiratory pressure (EEP), capnogram, oxygram, and exhaled tidal volume (VTe) remains insufficient.
Methods: The study included 20 healthy subjects with 12 combinations of PFR (30-60-80 L/min) and FO (40-60-80-100%) multiplied by 4 breathing patterns: mouth closed (CM), mouth open (OM), and combination of the CM and OM with hyperpnea (HCM and HOM). Pressure, capnogram, oxygram were measured from hypopharyngeal catheter, VTe, and subject's comfort were assessed.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am
September 2025
Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA. Electronic address:
The article discusses the types of respiratory failure, evidence, indications for noninvasive support modalities of continuous positive airway pressure, high flow nasal cannula, and bilevel positive airway pressure and considerations for using and monitoring each modality to provide optimal patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Emerg Med
August 2025
Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objective: Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) is a significant cause of emergency department (ED) visits due to dyspnea. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is currently the recommended first-line treatment for respiratory failure secondary to ACPE. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and NIV in improving respiratory rate (RR) and other clinical outcomes in adult patients presenting to the ED with ACPE.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
August 2025
Systems Engineering Institute, Academy of Military Sciences, People's Liberation Army, Tianjin, 300161, China.
Accurate and timely prediction of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) treatment failure in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) can lower patient mortality. Previous studies have highlighted inconsistencies in the predictive performance of existing indices, such as ROX and mROX, which are limited by their reliance on oxygenation parameters alone. To address this, we developed a machine learning-based predictive model using temporal data from AHRF patients, aimed at facilitating quicker development of individualized treatment plans and intervention strategies for healthcare professionals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF