Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: There is debate regarding routine repeat head computed tomography (CT) in blunt trauma patients on a pre-injury antithrombotic when the initial CT is negative for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).
Data Sources: Retrospective chart review and systematic literature review with meta-analysis.
Conclusions: In the chart review, 32.1% did not have a repeat head CT and 67.9% did. The delayed ICH incidence between those with and without a repeat head CT was similar (1.7% vs 0, p = .3101). The current study was combined with the identified 24 studies. Delayed ICH with or without routine repeat CT was similar between antiplatelet and anticoagulant categories (1.4% vs. 1.3%, p = .5322). Delayed ICH was lower for patients without routine repeat CT compared to those with routine repeat CT (0.8% vs 1.7%, p = .0008). For this patient population, repeat scans should be discretionary. Routine repeat CT may identify a larger proportion of minor delayed ICH.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.10.006 | DOI Listing |