98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Revision total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) are associated with an increased rate of complications. To date, it is unclear what drives readmission after aseptic revision arthroplasty and what measures can be taken to possibly avoid them. The purpose of this study is to (1) determine the reasons for readmission after aseptic revision TJA and (2) identify patient-specific or postoperative risk factors through a multivariate analysis.
Methods: A retrospective study examined 1503 cases of aseptic revision TJA between 2009 and 2016 at an urban tertiary care hospital. Eighty-seven cases (5.8%) of readmission within 90 days of index surgery were identified. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess independent risk factors for readmission.
Results: The reasons for readmission were infection (38%), wound complications (22%), and dislocation/instability of the prosthetic joint (13%). Only preoperative anemia was associated with an increased odds ratio (OR) of readmission (OR 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.126-2.970, P = .015), whereas postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with aspirin (OR 0.58, 90% CI 0.340-0.974, P = .039) and discharge to an inpatient rehab facility (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.051-0.950, P = .042) were associated with significantly lower odds of readmission.
Conclusion: Based on this single institutional study, addressing preoperative anemia and considering the implementation of aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may be 2 targets to potentially reduce readmission after aseptic revision TJA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.013 | DOI Listing |
Orthop Surg
September 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Objective: Durable and biologically integrated fixation is critical for long-term implant survival in patients with primary bone tumors. However, limited evidence exists regarding the long-term outcomes of uncemented stem designs in this population. Specifically, we investigated: (1) the long-term patient and implant survivorship rates; (2) the influence of factors such as resection length and patient age on implant survival; and (3) the incidence and types of complications, particularly those requiring implant removal or revision.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sana Hospital Sommerfeld, Kremmen, Germany.
Purpose: This study aimed to determine diagnostic thresholds for synovial fluid leucocyte count and polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage to identify the diagnosis periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs).
Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 239 patients who underwent revision of an UKA for either septic or aseptic indications at five university-affiliated medical centres. Among these, 30 patients (13%) underwent revision for PJI and 209 (87%) for noninfectious causes.
Foot Ankle Orthop
July 2025
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Background: Total ankle replacement (TAR) is a surgical option for patients with ankle arthritis who have failed conservative measures. Newer implants have markedly improved; however, osteolysis causing aseptic loosening continues to be a main cause of TAR failure. The objective of this study was to review the HINTEGRA TAR experience at a single institution specifically evaluating the presence and outcomes of osteolysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthopadie (Heidelb)
September 2025
Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, 10021, New York, NY, USA.
Background: The treatment of patients following primary total knee arthroplasty requiring revision surgery is one of the most demanding tasks in orthopedic surgery. A careful failure analysis and a systematic approach are of great importance for the often very individual situations. In addition to excellent technical skills, preoperative planning is of great importance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee
September 2025
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Background: Aseptic tibial loosening is a leading cause of revision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous work has highlighted concerns over the 5-year survivorship of a specific non-augmentable NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilised (LPS) tibial baseplate. This study compares the long-term outcomes of augmentable versus non-augmentable tibial implants with a minimum 10-year follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF