A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Genomic profiling of a dedifferentiated mucosal melanoma following exposure to immunotherapy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The treatment landscape for metastatic melanoma has been revolutionised by the introduction of immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Despite these advances, some patients exhibit primary or acquired resistance to treatment. We present the case of a resected mucosal melanoma that on relapse underwent transformation to a dedifferentiated state. The relapsed tumour was phenotypically disparate and demonstrated loss of all typical melanoma-associated immunohistochemical markers. Furthermore, it demonstrated aggressive biological behaviour and immunotherapy resistance. We performed genomic profiling of the original and relapsed tumour to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying this rare phenomenon. Mass spectrometry-based single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping technology was used to screen for mutations in the original and recurrent tumour. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on the original tumour, recurrent tumour and blood. Both the original and recurrent tumour shared a NRAS mutation, a similar aneuploidy profile and proportion of somatic single-nucleotide variants. However, in contrast to the original tumour, the recurrent tumour demonstrated a lower mutational burden and deletions in the CDKN2A/CDKN2B and CHEK2 genes. The genomic similarity between the original and recurrent tumour attests to a common ancestry and the possible existence of nongenomic drivers inciting phenotype plasticity. In contrast, the low mutational load and potential inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in the recurrent tumour may underlie its rapid proliferative rate and immunoresistance. Dynamic treatment models are desired in the future to track the genomic and epigenetic evolution of a tumour to guide optimal therapy choice and sequencing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000636DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

recurrent tumour
24
tumour
12
original recurrent
12
genomic profiling
8
mucosal melanoma
8
relapsed tumour
8
original tumour
8
tumour recurrent
8
original
6
recurrent
6

Similar Publications