A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparative dosimetry between Tc-MAA SPECT/CT and Y PET/CT in primary and metastatic liver tumors. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to determine whether Tc-MAA SPECT/CT-based dosimetry could predict the actual absorbed dose in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases, treated by glass or resin microspheres.

Material And Methods: Fifty-seven patients who underwent selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) were retrospectively included in the study, for a total of 59 treatments. Nineteen HCC were treated by resin microspheres (HCC-SIR), 20 HCC with glass microspheres (HCC-Thera), and 20 liver metastases with resin microspheres (Metastases-SIR). The mean absorbed doses in tumoral liver (Dm) and non-tumoral liver (DmNTL) were determined on the Tc-MAA SPECT/CT and the Y PET/CT, and compared with each other.

Results: DmNTL was < 50 Gy in the 3 groups, with a strong correlation in all population, albeit slightly lower in Metastases-SIR than HCC-SIR and HCC-Thera (CCC 0.8, 0.94 and 0.96, respectively). In tumoral liver, Dm was higher in HCC than metastases (159 ± 117 Gy versus 63 ± 31 Gy). Tc-MAA SPECT/CT proved to be a better indicator of Dm in HCC compared with metastases, with similar Tc-MAA-Y concordance in resin and glass microspheres (CCC HCC-SIR 0.82, CCC HCC-Thera 0.82, and CCC Metastases-SIR 0.52).

Conclusion: Tc-MAA SPECT/CT is a reasonably reliable tool for predicting the dose to the non-tumoral liver in both HCC and metastases, regardless of the type of microspheres. It is also fairly reliable for predicting the tumor dose in HCC, again regardless of the type of spheres, although individual variations are observed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04465-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tc-maa spect/ct
8
spect/ct pet/ct
8
liver metastases
8
resin microspheres
8
liver
5
comparative dosimetry
4
dosimetry tc-maa
4
pet/ct primary
4
primary metastatic
4
metastatic liver
4

Similar Publications