98%
921
2 minutes
20
The aim of this Letter to the Editor was to respond to a comment highlighting potential statistical biases in an analysis of our recently published article. We therefore specified the method for selecting the model variables in order to limit overfitting, then we used the Firth method to control the sparse data bias, and finally for checking internal validity we used bootstrapping methods. In total, the conclusions of our model were not changed by these new analyses.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540390 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0635-1 | DOI Listing |
Obes Surg
September 2025
Department of General Surgery, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Int Urol Nephrol
September 2025
Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.
World J Urol
September 2025
Sindh Medical College, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
J Neurol
September 2025
Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Background: The "Systematic Screening of Handwriting Difficulties in Parkinson's Disease" (SOS) test is the only tool specifically designed to evaluate handwriting in people with Parkinson's Disease (pwPD). It is language specific.
Objective: To assess the construct validity, intrarater and interrater reliability of the Italian version of the SOS test.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
September 2025
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.