A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Amino Acid Encoding Methods for Protein Sequences: A Comprehensive Review and Assessment. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

As the first step of machine-learning based protein structure and function prediction, the amino acid encoding play a fundamental role in the final success of those methods. Different from the protein sequence encoding, the amino acid encoding can be used in both residue-level and sequence-level prediction of protein properties by combining them with different algorithms. However, it has not attracted enough attention in the past decades, and there are no comprehensive reviews and assessments about encoding methods so far. In this article, we make a systematic classification and propose a comprehensive review and assessment for various amino acid encoding methods. Those methods are grouped into five categories according to their information sources and information extraction methodologies, including binary encoding, physicochemical properties encoding, evolution-based encoding, structure-based encoding, and machine-learning encoding. Then, 16 representative methods from five categories are selected and compared on protein secondary structure prediction and protein fold recognition tasks by using large-scale benchmark datasets. The results show that the evolution-based position-dependent encoding method PSSM achieved the best performance, and the structure-based and machine-learning encoding methods also show some potential for further application, the neural network based distributed representation of amino acids in particular may bring new light to this area. We hope that the review and assessment are useful for future studies in amino acid encoding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2019.2911677DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

amino acid
20
acid encoding
20
encoding methods
16
encoding
14
review assessment
12
methods protein
8
comprehensive review
8
prediction protein
8
machine-learning encoding
8
methods
7

Similar Publications