A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effect of "surgery first" orthognathic approach on temporomandibular symptoms and function: a comparison with "orthodontic first" approach. | LitMetric

Effect of "surgery first" orthognathic approach on temporomandibular symptoms and function: a comparison with "orthodontic first" approach.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol

Division of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Science, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

Published: May 2019


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effects of the surgery-first approach (SFA) and the orthodontics-first approach (OFA) on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function and maximum mouth opening.

Study Design: This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of patients with diagnosed skeletal class III dentofacial deformities. Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the OFA group, and 23 patients were enrolled in the SFA group. All patients were examined in the same manner 4 times: before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Range of mouth opening (ROM) was measured between the maxillary and mandibular central incisors. Symptoms were evaluated subjectively by using a questionnaire with items pertaining to pain on mandibular movements, TMJ sounds, and pain in masticatory muscles region.

Results: No severe complications or relapse occurred in either group during the 12-month follow-up period. Postoperative changes in ROM showed similar tendencies, but there was no significant difference in ROM during the follow-up period between the OFA and SFA groups (P < .05). The percentage reduction was nearly 45% at 1 month postoperatively and 20% at 3 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative situation. After 6 months postoperatively, the ROM was almost the same as before surgery. The number of patients with such sounds increased with time until 12-month postoperative examinations in the OFA group but increased slightly during this period in the SFA group. During the first 3 months postoperatively, less than 10% of patients in both groups had newly detected pain of TMJ and/or muscles. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, only 1 patient in the SFA group had pain.

Conclusions: No significant differences in TMJ symptoms or function were observed during a 12-month follow-up period between patients with skeletal class III malocclusion treated with the SFA and those treated with the OFA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

months postoperatively
16
sfa group
12
follow-up period
12
symptoms function
8
skeletal class
8
class iii
8
patients enrolled
8
ofa group
8
group patients
8
12-month follow-up
8

Similar Publications