Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background and Purpose- Limited data are available describing the relative effectiveness, safety, and optimal dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in East Asian patients. We tried to compare effectiveness and safety outcomes of standard- and low-dose NOACs and warfarin in this population. Methods- Using nationwide administrative claims-based datasets from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database (July 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016), this study comprised 56 504 anticoagulation-naive nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with high thromboembolic risk (CHADS-VASc score, ≥2) treated with oral anticoagulants. Main study outcomes included thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke or systemic embolism), major bleeding, and mortality. Results- Among the study patients, 10 409 (18.4%) received warfarin and 46 095 (81.6%) were treated with NOACs: dabigatran (n=12 593; 22.3%), rivaroxaban (n=21 000; 37.2%), and apixaban (n=12 502; 22.1%). Low-dose NOAC (75.1% dabigatran, 59.7% rivaroxaban, and 62.7% apixaban) was more frequently used than standard-dose NOAC. During median follow-up of 15.0 months, each NOAC was associated with significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.81 for dabigatran; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65-0.83 for rivaroxaban; and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.78 for apixaban). Regarding safety outcomes, dabigatran (HR, 0.81; CI, 0.69-0.95) and apixaban (HR, 0.67; CI, 0.56-0.79) were associated with lower risk of major bleeding but not with rivaroxaban (HR, 0.96; CI, 0.84-1.11). Among adults <75 years of age without chronic kidney disease, use of low-dose apixaban did not demonstrate clinical benefit over warfarin with respect to thromboembolic events (HR, 0.99; CI, 0.76-1.28) and mortality (HR, 0.85; CI, 0.62-1.16). Conclusions- In this cohort of East Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, NOACs were associated with better effectiveness and safety outcomes versus warfarin. Lower NOAC doses were more often used, but an unjustified underdosing of apixaban seems to result in lower clinical benefit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023093DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral anticoagulants
12
atrial fibrillation
12
outcomes standard-
8
standard- low-dose
8
asian patients
8
effectiveness safety
8
nonvalvular atrial
8
safety outcomes
8
thromboembolic events
8
major bleeding
8

Similar Publications

Risk Factors for Incidental Durotomy in Initial Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis with Bilateral Neurogenic Claudication.

World Neurosurg

September 2025

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan; University of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. Electronic address:

Objective: To identify significant risk factors for incidental durotomy (ID) in initial posterior decompression surgery for lumbar central canal stenosis and to explore whether these risks vary by surgical approach through subgroup analyses.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent single-level posterior decompression surgery for lumbar central canal stenosis with bilateral neurogenic claudication at eight hospitals between April 2017 and May 2023. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical details, including surgeon certification status, were collected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Limited data are available on treatment, particularly in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to evaluate current management strategies and outcomes in patients with cancer and recurrent VTE during treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or DOACs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Critically ill adults are more commonly being admitted to intensive care units (ICU) with a recent history of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use. No consensus guidance exists on optimal anticoagulation strategies in critically ill adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) on DOAC's prior to ICU admission, and there is considerable variability in clinical practice. To evaluate rates of major bleeding and thrombosis between 2 anticoagulation strategies for NVAF upon ICU admission: package insert (continuation of oral or parenteral anticoagulation per manufacturer recommendations) vs non-package insert (prophylactic dosing or delayed therapeutic anticoagulation).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Medicare plans employ drug utilization management strategies, including prior authorization (PA) and step therapy (ST), or formulary tier increases, to control spending. However, PA and ST can delay treatment access and encourage use of less effective/safe therapies, while formulary tier increases can lead to treatment switching/discontinuation due to higher patient out-of-pocket costs. This study modeled the impact of restricted access to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and a tier increase for apixaban, on incidence and cost of clinical events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF