Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: PCR-RFLP (polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism) techniques have been used for the diagnosis of bacteria in some infections. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PCR for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and to identify isolated microorganisms, using the RFLP method.

Methods: During January 2015 to January 2018, patients who were suspected of having PJI after arthroplasty surgery or were candidates for revision surgery due to loosening of implant entered the study. Patients who had 1 major criterion or 3 minor criteria for PJI based on the Philadelphia Consensus Criteria (PCC) on Periprosthetic Joint Infection were considered as cases of PJI. Both culture results and PCR findings, were cross compared with results of the PCC (as the gold standard criteria).

Results: Overall, 76 samples were included in the study. Mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 66.72 ± 11.82 years. Overall, 57.9% of patients were females. Prevalence of PJI was 50% based on the PCC. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and general efficacy of PCR for detection of PJI was 97.4%, 100%, 100%, 97.4%, and 98.7%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and general efficacy of culture was 31.6%, 100%, 65.7%, 100%, and 59.4%, respectively. We isolated a broad range of bacteria using PCR-RFLP including Gram-positive cocci such as Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., and Enterococcus sp., and Gram-negative bacilli such as Enterobacteriaceae sp., Pseudomonas sp. Citrobacter sp., as well as Chlamydophila pneumonia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Brucella melitensis, non-gonococcal Neisseria, Kingella kingae, Bacteroides ovatus, and Proteus mirabilis from PJI patients.

Conclusion: Inhere, for the first time, we showed that PCR-RFLP is a powerful tool for identifying the type of bacteria involved in PJI, and can be used for follow-up of patients suspected of PJI and those with a history of antibiotic use. PCR-RFLP may be able to substantially decrease detection time of PJI among PCR-based methods, while allowing more accurate identification of the bacteria involved.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pji
10
polymerase chain
8
fragment length
8
length polymorphism
8
prosthetic joint
8
joint infections
8
patients suspected
8
suspected pji
8
sensitivity specificity
8
specificity positive
8

Similar Publications

Background: Differentiating periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) from aseptic failure is challenging in total joint arthroplasty. To date, there is no consensus about the most accurate criteria to diagnose PJI. The current study compares common diagnostic PJI criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Periprosthetic joint infection: Time to think outside the box.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

September 2025

International Joint Center, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Despite undisputed success of orthopaedic procedures, surgical site infections (SSI) such as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to compromise the outcome and result in major clinical and economic burden. The overall rate of infection is expected to rise in the future resulting in significant associated mortality and morbidity. Traditional concepts have largely attributed the source of PJI to exogenous pathogens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study evaluated the applicability of histopathology, culture, and Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods: In this prospective trial, 215 consecutive patients with suspected knee PJI were enrolled. Tissue specimens were aseptically collected and processed for histopathological analysis, culture, and mNGS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant retention for acute periprosthetic infections].

Orthopadie (Heidelb)

September 2025

Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.

Background: The DAIR procedure (debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention) represents a treatment option for acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Compared to revision arthroplasty, it is technically less invasive and, under appropriate indications, can preserve a well-fixed endoprosthesis. However, treatment success depends on numerous patient-, pathogen-, and procedure-related factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Approximately 1-2% of patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty encounter a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, the treatment involves revision surgeries and long-term antibiotic therapy. However, too low antibiotic concentrations can lead to treatment failure, whereas excessively high concentrations can lead to adverse events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF