98%
921
2 minutes
20
In 2017, due to a fluid shortage secondary to Hurricane Maria's devastation of Puerto Rico, hospitals and health-systems began to substitute rolapitant for fosaprepitant as part of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prevention and treatment strategies. However, despite advantageous pharmacologic and formulation (e.g. long half-life, quicker time to onset, and lack of first-pass hepatic metabolism) profiles, there seems to be significant risk of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions associated with the administration of intravenous rolapitant. In January 2018, the U.S. FDA issued a Health Care Provider Letter stating that anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock, and other serious hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in the postmarketing setting. Importantly, these reactions were observed at a higher rate than initially reported in the phase 1 bioequivalence study that led to FDA approval of intravenous rolapitant (2.8%), with many resulting in hospitalizations. At our institution, rolapitant-induced infusion-related reactions also occurred in more patients than expected (8.7%). Described herein are six cases of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions with intravenous rolapitant at the North Carolina Cancer Hospital. Due to the quick onset of the infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions with intravenous rolapitant, interpatient differences in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics are unlikely to be the cause. An objective assessment utilizing the Naranjo Causality Scale rates these infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions as definite adverse drug reactions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078155218808084 | DOI Listing |
BMC Med
August 2025
Department of Clinical Research, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Background: This phase I trial aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and preliminary efficacy of a single dose of HR20013 (mixed formulation of fosrolapitant and palonosetron) plus dexamethasone in patients with malignant solid tumors.
Methods: Solid tumor patients who were naive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and scheduled to receive the single-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients would receive a single intravenous infusion of HR20013 (Day 1) before cisplatin-based chemotherapy, alongside oral dexamethasone (Day 1, 12 mg, once a day; Day 2-4, 3.
Expert Opin Drug Saf
December 2019
Division of Hematology Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Experimental Therapeutics Program, UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmmingham, AL, USA.
: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a significant clinical issue that affects patients' quality of life as well as treatment decisions. Significant improvements in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting have occurred in the past 15 years with the introduction of new antiemetic agents 5-HT3, receptor antagonists, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, and olanzapine. Oral (aprepitant, 2003; netupitant, 2014; rolapitant, 2015) neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists have been developed along with intravenous formulations (fosaprepitant, NEPA, rolapitant, HTX-019) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Lett Drugs Ther
December 2018
J Oncol Pharm Pract
October 2019
1 Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Hospitals and Clinics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
In 2017, due to a fluid shortage secondary to Hurricane Maria's devastation of Puerto Rico, hospitals and health-systems began to substitute rolapitant for fosaprepitant as part of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prevention and treatment strategies. However, despite advantageous pharmacologic and formulation (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOnco Targets Ther
October 2018
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center and West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
To examine pharmacologic and clinical characteristics of neurokinin 1 (NK)-receptor antagonists (RAs) for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, a literature search was performed for clinical studies in patients at risk of CINV with any approved NK RAs in the title or abstract: aprepitant (capsules or oral suspension), HTX019 (intravenous [IV] aprepitant), fosaprepitant (IV aprepitant prodrug), rolapitant (tablets or IV), and fixed-dose tablets combining netupitant or fosnetupi-tant (IV netupitant prodrug) with the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5HT) RA palonosetron (oral or IV). All NK RAs are effective, but exhibit important differences in efficacy against acute and delayed CINV. The magnitude of benefit of NK-RA-containing three-drug vs two-drug regimens is greater for delayed vs acute CINV.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF