Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To compare the outcome in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) who underwent standard phacoemulsification vs femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in the treatment of visually significant cataracts.
Design: Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series.
Methods: Patient or Study Population: Between April 2013 and December 2016, 140 FED eyes with cataracts of all densities were included. Seventy-two eyes underwent phacoemulsification and 68 eyes underwent FLACS. Intervention or Observation Procedures: Automated noncontact specular microscopy was performed at baseline and postoperatively over a mean of 17.91 ± 10.47 months. Parameters collected include visual acuity, slit-lamp examination findings, and intraoperative findings.
Main Outcome Measures: Pachymetry, endothelial cell density (ECD), and coefficient of variance (COV) were compared.
Results: Phacoemulsification had significantly greater postoperative median loss of ECD of 229.0 cells/mm (14.2%) compared to FLACS ECD of 133.0 cells/mm (6.5%) (U = 1343.0, Z = -2.241, P = .025). Mean loss of ECD was 346.524 ± 420.472 cells/mm and 119.964 ± 434.882 cells/mm for phacoemulsification and FLACS, respectively (P = .005). Mean percentage loss of ECD was 15.3% ± 17.5% for phacoemulsification and 4.4% ± 25.0% for FLACS (P = .006). Eyes that underwent phacoemulsification had 10.7% ± 15.4% mean ECD loss in the mild cataract group, and in the moderate/hard cataract group 19.5% ± 18.0%, P = .045. Eyes that underwent FLACS had 0.9% ± 22.5% mean ECD loss in the mild cataract group, and 8.2% ± 26.3% in the moderate/hard cataract group, P = .291. Comparison between procedures of mean ECD loss for moderate/hard cataracts was significant (P = .043).
Conclusions: FLACS is shown to be superior to phacoemulsification in reducing postoperative endothelial cell loss in FED patients, which translates to a lower risk of corneal decompensation, especially in patients with moderate/hard cataract densities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.006 | DOI Listing |