A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Resident Attrition in Plastic Surgery: A National Survey of Plastic Surgery Program Directors. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Attrition in plastic surgery is poorly characterized in the literature with previous data indicating that independent residents may have a higher rate of voluntary attrition with integrated residents having a higher rate of involuntary attrition. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors, note differences between pathways, and provide insight into resident attrition from plastic surgery residencies.

Methods: An institutional review board-approved anonymous, multiple-choice and short answer, online survey regarding resident attrition was sent to all plastic surgery program directors (PDs) in the United States focusing from 2003 to 2013. Outcomes measured included demographics of the program and attritional resident, timing and reasons for attrition, and possibility of preventing attrition.

Results: Thirty-three (35%) of 95 PDs responded. Average attrition rates were calculated at 2.15% for independent and 0.85% for integrated programs. Risk factors for attrition included being single, divorced, male, and having no dependents. One hundred percent of independent residents left by year 2, and 86% of integrated residents left by year 4. Lifestyle and loss of interest were most sited reasons for attrition. Most independent residents returned to their original field of training, whereas integrated residents were more likely to transfer to another integrated program. Only 17% of PDs believed attrition could have been prevented.

Conclusions: Approximately 3.0% of all plastic surgery residents underwent attrition. Being single, male, divorced, or having no dependents increases the risk of attrition in plastic surgery residencies. This is the first study to demonstrate potential risks factors for plastic surgery residents undergoing attrition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001526DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

plastic surgery
32
attrition plastic
20
attrition
13
resident attrition
12
independent residents
12
integrated residents
12
plastic
8
surgery
8
surgery program
8
program directors
8

Similar Publications