98%
921
2 minutes
20
Healthcare professionals are often expected to critically appraise research evidence in order to make recommendations for practice and policy development. Here we describe the Critical Appraisal Toolkit (CAT) currently used by the Public Health Agency of Canada. The CAT consists of: algorithms to identify the type of study design, three separate tools (for appraisal of analytic studies, descriptive studies and literature reviews), additional tools to support the appraisal process, and guidance for summarizing evidence and drawing conclusions about a body of evidence. Although the toolkit was created to assist in the development of national guidelines related to infection prevention and control, clinicians, policy makers and students can use it to guide appraisal of any health-related quantitative research. Participants in a pilot test completed a total of 101 critical appraisals and found that the CAT was user-friendly and helpful in the process of critical appraisal. Feedback from participants of the pilot test of the CAT informed further revisions prior to its release. The CAT adds to the arsenal of available tools and can be especially useful when the best available evidence comes from non-clinical trials and/or studies with weak designs, where other tools may not be easily applied.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5764727 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v43i09a02 | DOI Listing |
Diabetologia
September 2025
Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
This review article, developed by the EASD Global Council, addresses the growing global challenges in diabetes research and care, highlighting the rising prevalence of diabetes, the increasing complexity of its management and the need for a coordinated international response. With regard to research, disparities in funding and infrastructure between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are discussed. The under-representation of LMIC populations in clinical trials, challenges in conducting large-scale research projects, and the ethical and legal complexities of artificial intelligence integration are also considered as specific issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Robot Surg
September 2025
Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
September 2025
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Background: Radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) but may induce various side effects on surrounding normal tissues. To reach an optimal balance between tumour control and toxicity prevention, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models have been reported to predict the risk of radiation-induced side effects in patients with HNC. However, the quality of study design, conduct, and analysis (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNurs Res
September 2025
Health Services Research Enterprise, Philadelphia, PA.
Background: Authentic leadership in nursing is associated with positive nurse outcomes globally. However, the last published systematic review, in 2018, showed no evidence from the United States and little evidence of effect on patient or health system outcomes.
Objectives: To systematically review, appraise, and synthesize evidence focused on the effect of authentic leadership on nurse, patient, and system outcomes in acute care hospitals in the U.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)
September 2025
Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan;
This letter offers constructive feedback of the study by Sağun et al. on changing allergen sensitivity in the COVID-19 pandemic. The data presented were very interesting concerning the changing rates of sensitization, but the authors neglected some important areas requiring further consideration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF