Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To understand why patients "no-show" for imaging appointments, and to provide new insights for improving resource utilization.

Materials And Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of nearly 2.9 million outpatient examinations in our radiology information system from 2000 to 2015 at our multihospital academic institution. No-show visits were identified by the "reason code" entry "NOSHOW" in our radiology information system. We restricted data to radiography, CT, mammography, MRI, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine examinations that included all studied variables. These variables included modality, patient age, appointment time, day of week, and scheduling lead time. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with no-show visits.

Results: Out of 2,893,626 patient visits that met our inclusion criteria, there were 94,096 no-shows during the 16-year period. Rates of no-show visits varied from 3.36% in 2000 to 2.26% in 2015. The effect size for no-shows was strongest for modality and scheduling lead time. Mammography had the highest modality no-show visit rate of 6.99% (odds ratio [OR] 5.38, P < .001) compared with the lowest modality rate of 1.25% in radiography. Scheduling lead time greater than 6 months was associated with more no-show visits than scheduling within 1 week (OR 3.18, P < .001). Patients 60 years and older were less likely to miss imaging appointments than patients under 40 (OR 0.70, P < .001). Mondays and Saturdays had significantly higher rates of no-show than Sundays (OR 1.52 and 1.51, P < .001).

Conclusion: Modality type and scheduling lead time were the most predictive factors of no-show. This may be used to guide new interventions such as targeted reminders and flexible scheduling.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.053DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

no-show visits
12
scheduling lead
12
lead time
12
imaging appointments
8
radiology system
8
associated no-show
8
rates no-show
8
no-show
7
visits
5
understanding patients
4

Similar Publications

Access to desired contraceptive care is a critical component of reproductive autonomy. Telemedicine (TM), or the remote provision of clinical services via technology, in community-based health centers has the potential to expand access to family planning services, potentially enhancing both reproductive autonomy and equity. However, little is known about which patient populations use TM for contraceptive services in the US " safety net" (community-based health centers), if there are inequities in access to TM care, or patient preferences for TM contraceptive care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Telehealth has emerged as a powerful tool for managing chronic diseases and mental health conditions, offering increased access to care and improved patient outcomes. However, inequities in digital connectivity and technological resources have created significant disparities in access to these potentially life-changing services, disproportionately impacting marginalized and minoritized communities across the globe.

Methods: Data on 473,716 telehealth encounters occurring between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023 were retrieved from the electronic health records (EHR) system used by University Hospitals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to analyse no-show patterns in healthcare appointments, identify associated factors, and explore key determinants influencing non-attendance. This was a retrospective observational study. We analysed 120,405 healthcare appointments from 2022-2023 in Turin, Northern Italy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This scoping review examines how telemedicine addresses healthcare needs in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQIA+) community, focusing on gender-affirming care, mental health, and testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted to identify studies published until March 2024 focusing on telemedicine services for LGBTQIA + individuals. Data extraction captured study characteristics, telemedicine applications, and patient and provider satisfaction, and was synthesized to map current knowledge and identify gaps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) require continuous management to achieve optimal outcomes. Socioeconomic barriers can impede the delivery of optimal diabetes care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine likely reduced common barriers to care compared with in-person visits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF