98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aims: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects between 5 and 10% of all pregnancies in Canada and can lead to adverse health outcomes in both the mother and fetus. Amino acids (AA) and acylcarnitines (AC) have been identified as early biomarkers of type 2 diabetes but their usefulness in screening for GDM has yet to be demonstrated.
Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study involving 50 controls and 50 GDM cases diagnosed between the 24th and 28th week of gestation. Heparinized plasma samples were obtained during the first and early second trimester of pregnancy. Case and controls were matched according to date of recruitment, maternal age, gestational age at blood sampling as well as pre-pregnancy body mass index. Eight AA and eight AC were quantified using an ultra-high pressure liquid-chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry platform. Conditional regression analyses adjusted for matching factors and smoking habits during pregnancy were performed to identify plasma metabolites associated with GDM risk.
Results: Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the prediction of GDM per one standard deviation increase of AA or AC in plasma levels were 0.25 (0.08-0.79) for butyrylcarnitine, 0.31 (0.12-0.79) for glutamic acid, 2.5 (1.2-5.3) for acetylcarnitine, 2.9 (1.3-6.8) for isobutyrylcarnitine and 5.3 (1.7-17.0) for leucine. These five metabolites were selected by stepwise conditional logistic regression to create a predictive model with an OR of 2.7 (1.5-4.9).
Conclusion: Whether the identified metabolites can predict the risk of developing GDM requires additional studies in a larger sample of pregnant women.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.03.058 | DOI Listing |
BJOG
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Objective: To compare maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes between women who are English proficient (EP) and those who have limited English proficiency (LEP).
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Single US academic medical centre with interpreter services.
BJOG
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Objectives: To examine the combined influence of food environment, built environment, socio-economic status and individual factors (maternal age, parity, smoking status and need for an interpreter) on maternal overweight, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) births in Australia.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Melbourne, Australia.
Open Heart
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Background: Evidence regarding cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes is limited. Our study aimed to describe left ventricular (LV) remodelling and vascular adaptation to pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, three consecutive cardiac MRI scans were conducted on age-matched and BMI-matched pregnant women with pregestational type 1 diabetes and pregnant women without diabetes.
BMJ Open
September 2025
Neath Port Talbot Hospital, Port Talbot, Wales, UK.
Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is common in pregnancy and is increasing in prevalence. It is associated with an increased risk of maternal and perinatal complications if not diagnosed and managed early. Most guidelines suggest making a diagnosis of GDM using an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy at which stage there still is an increased risk of complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Med Res
September 2025
Atención Materna en Unidad de Investigación Médica en Epidemiología Clínica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Aim: To describe the annual incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among women beneficiaries of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) in Mexico from 2008 to 2023.
Methods: Data from the IMSS's Institutional Automated System for Epidemiological Surveillance (SIAVE) from 2008 to 2023 were used. GDM cases during pregnancy were identified using ICD-10 O24.