Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Combination therapy with ezetimibe and statins is recommended in cases of statin intolerance or insufficiency. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with ezetimibe and rosuvastatin versus those of rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Methods: I-ROSETTE (Ildong ROSuvastatin & ezETimibe for hypercholesTElolemia) was an 8-week, double-blind, multicenter, Phase III randomized controlled trial conducted at 20 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients with hypercholesterolemia who required medical treatment according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines were eligible for participation in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ezetimibe 10 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg/rosuvastatin 10 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg/rosuvastatin 5 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, or rosuvastatin 5 mg in a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary end point was the difference in the mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C level after 8 weeks of treatment between the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin treatment groups. All patients were assessed for adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, and vital signs.

Findings: Of 396 patients, 389 with efficacy data were analyzed. Baseline characteristics among 6 groups were similar. After 8 weeks of double-blind treatment, the percent changes in adjusted mean LDL-C levels at week 8 compared with baseline values were -57.0% (2.1%) and -44.4% (2.1%) in the total ezetimibe/rosuvastatin and total rosuvastatin groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The LDL-C-lowering efficacy of each of the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin combinations was superior to that of each of the respective doses of rosuvastatin. The mean percent change in LDL-C level in all ezetimibe/rosuvastatin combination groups was >50%. The number of patients who achieved target LDL-C levels at week 8 was significantly greater in the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin group (180 [92.3%] of 195 patients) than in the rosuvastatin monotherapy group (155 [79.9%] of 194 patients) (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of overall AEs, adverse drug reactions, and serious AEs; laboratory findings, including liver function test results and creatinine kinase levels, were comparable between groups.

Implications: Fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin significantly improved lipid profiles in patients with hypercholesterolemia compared with rosuvastatin monotherapy. All groups treated with rosuvastatin and ezetimibe reported a decrease in mean LDL-C level >50%. The safety and tolerability of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin therapy were comparable with those of rosuvastatin monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02749994.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.12.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rosuvastatin monotherapy
20
rosuvastatin
16
combination therapy
12
therapy ezetimibe
12
patients hypercholesterolemia
12
rosuvastatin ezetimibe
12
ezetimibe mg/rosuvastatin
12
ldl-c level
12
patients
10
ezetimibe
9

Similar Publications

Rosuvastatin can block human ether-a-go-go related gene (hERG) currents and prolong the corrected QT (QTc) interval, but this effect has not been confirmed in the population. This study compared the changes of QTc interval between populations receiving atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, explained the effect of rosuvastatin on QTc interval, and the correlation between rosuvastatin and QT prolongation. The QTc interval decreased by 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endothelial function in high-risk patients with ezetimibe therapy.

J Clin Lipidol

July 2025

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany (Drs Günes-Altan, Bosch, Striepe, Schiffer, Schmieder, and Kannenkeril).

Background: Impaired endothelial function predicts cardiovascular (CV) events, even in patients with established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to compare the endothelial function between high-risk patients on optimized statin therapy with and without additional ezetimibe treatment.

Methods: A total of 91 patients with ASCVD and statin treatment (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) were included and underwent examination of endothelial function by the UNEX EF device.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Achieving rapid and substantial reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) soon after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Current guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy, yet many patients fail to reach LDL-C targets early, putting them at continued risk. The present study investigates whether upfront combination therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg, started at admission, is more effective and efficient in achieving early LDL-C goals compared to statin monotherapy in statin-naïve ACS patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: The goal of this study was to investigate lipid goal achievement rates in very high-risk patients over six months using high-intensity rosuvastatin or rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination lipid-lowering therapy. : This prospective, observational study was conducted on the patients of 150 general and 60 specialist practices. Our analysis included 3017 patients (47% women) who completed six months of therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe improves the lipid-lowering effect through different mechanisms of action. This study intended to compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe vs. rosuvastatin alone in hypercholesterolemia patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF