98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Preventing secondary insult to the brain is imperative following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although TBI does not preclude nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injuries, development of hypotension in this setting may be detrimental and could therefore lead trauma surgeons to a lower threshold for operative intervention and a potentially higher risk of failure of NOM (FNOM). We hypothesized that the presence of a TBI in patients with blunt splenic injury would lead to a higher risk of FNOM.
Methods: Patients with blunt splenic injury were selected from the National Trauma Data Bank research datasets from 2007 to 2011. TBI was defined as AIS head ≥ 3 and FNOM as patients who underwent a spleen-related operation after 2 h from admission. TBI patients were compared to those without head injury. The primary outcome was FNOM.
Results: Of 47,713 patients identified, 41,436 (86.8%) underwent a trial of NOM. FNOM was identical (10.6 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.601) among patients with and without TBI. TBI patients had lower adjusted odds for FNOM (AOR 0.66, p < 0.001), even among those with a high-grade splenic injury (AOR 0.68, p < 0.001). No difference in adjusted mortality was noted when comparing TBI patients with and without FNOM (AOR 1.01, p = 0.95).
Conclusions: NOM of blunt splenic trauma in TBI patients has higher adjusted odds for success. This could be related to interventions targeting prevention of secondary brain injury. Further studies are required to identify those specific practices that lead to a higher success rate of NOM of splenic trauma in TBI patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4494-0 | DOI Listing |
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
September 2025
Second Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, 1 Rimini Str, 12462, Haidari/Athens, Greece.
Injury
August 2025
Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, 1000 Blythe Blvd, MEB Office 601, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Electronic address:
Background: The role for routine follow-up imaging in nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) remains controversial. Delayed complications, specifically vascular abnormalities such as pseudoaneurysms are associated with failure of NOM (FNOM). This study examined a ten-year experience with NOM of BSI and the influence of repeat imaging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
August 2025
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden.
Our purpose was to assess the prevalence of liver injuries as well as concomitant injuries to the liver and spleen in patients with blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma, and to determine the prevalence, management and outcome of active bleeding and contained vascular injuries (CVI; pseudoaneurysm/AV-fistula) seen on admission CT. A retrospective, single-center, longitudinal cohort study with nine-year data (2013-2021) of all ≥ 15-year-old patients with severe blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma and an ICD code for liver and/or splenic trauma. CT examinations were identified.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCardiovasc Intervent Radiol
August 2025
Department of Radiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Introduction: Splenic artery embolisation (SAE) is a well-established treatment for high-grade splenic laceration due to blunt trauma in haemodynamically stable patients supported by major societal guidelines. However, guidelines support splenectomy in unstable patients, and there are limited data assessing the efficacy and role of SAE in this cohort. This study aimed to analyse the efficacy of splenic artery embolisation for unstable trauma patients in preventing mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF