A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The effect of humeral-fenestration diameter in Outerbridge-Kashiwagi arthroplasty on failure load of the distal humerus: a cadaveric biomechanical study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Outerbridge-Kashiwagi ulnohumeral arthroplasty is an effective method in treating elbow osteoarthritis; however, distal humerus fracture after surgery can become a critical issue. A previous biomechanical study has shown that the failure load of the distal humerus decreases after a fenestration, but the size of the fenestration hole has not yet been discussed.

Materials And Methods: 32 fresh-frozen cadaveric distal humeri were obtained. Two drill sizes were chosen for fenestration: 12 and 15 mm in diameter. Two directions of force were applied with a materials testing machine for biomechanical testing: 5° flexion for axial loading and 75° flexion for anterior-posterior (AP) loading. Each specimen randomly received one of the two fenestration sizes, and force directions. All specimens were loaded to failure at a rate of 2 mm/min.

Results: The failure loads of the 12 and 15 mm groups were not significantly different in either axial loading(3886 ± 1271 N vs 4286 ± 901 N) or AP loading(2303 ± 803 N vs 1897 ± 357 N). All specimens loaded with axial force failed via the fenestration holes; however, during AP loading, some specimens failed through the fenestration holes, while others at diaphysis (p = 0.28).

Conclusions: The failure load of distal humeri did not differ significantly after fenestration of 12 or 15 mm. The clinical relevance is that as the risk of distal humerus fracture is not exacerbated, a larger-size fenestration hole could be of help to improve the effectiveness of this surgical procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2876-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distal humerus
16
failure load
12
load distal
12
biomechanical study
8
humerus fracture
8
fenestration
8
fenestration hole
8
distal humeri
8
fenestration 15 mm
8
specimens loaded
8

Similar Publications