Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Although it is traditionally considered ominous, the natural history of early proximal attachment site endoleaks (IA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is not well known. Our aim was to identify risk factors for persistent type IA endoleaks and to determine their effect on long-term outcomes after EVAR.

Methods: All patients who underwent infrarenal EVAR at a single institution between 1998 and 2015 were identified. Preoperative axial imaging and intraoperative arteriograms were reviewed, and those patients with a type IA endoleak were further studied. Aneurysm features were characterized by two reviewers and were studied for predictors of persistent endoleaks at the conclusion of the case. Patient records and the Social Security Death Index were used to record 1-year and overall survival.

Results: We identified 1484 EVARs, 122 (8%) of which were complicated by a type IA endoleak on arteriography after graft deployment, with a median follow-up of 4 years. The majority of patients underwent additional ballooning of the proximal site (52 [43%]) or placement of an aortic cuff (47 [39%]); 30 patients (25%) received a Palmaz stent, and four patients were treated with coils or anchors. At case end, only 43 (35%) of the type IA endoleaks remained; at 1 month, only 16 endoleaks persisted (13%), and only six persisted at 1 year (6%). In multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of persistence of type IA endoleak at the conclusion of the case was the presence of extensive neck calcifications (odds ratio [OR], 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-67.9; P = .02). Thirteen patients (11%) underwent reintervention for type IA endoleaks, with a time frame ranging from 3 days postoperatively to 11 years. There were three patients (2.4%) who experienced aneurysm rupture. Postoperative type IA endoleak was associated with lower survival at 1 year (79% vs 91%; relative risk, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.4; P = .02), but it did not affect long-term survival (log-rank, P = .45). Both an increase in aneurysm sac size and failure of the endoleak to resolve by case end were independent predictors of a need for reintervention (growth: OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 2.2-31.6; P < .01; persistent endoleak: OR, 7.6; 95% CI, 1.8-31.5; P < .01). A persistent type IA endoleak was not independently associated with an increase in sac size on surveillance imaging (P = .28).

Conclusions: Aneurysm rupture secondary to persistent type IA endoleak is rare, and most will resolve within 1 year. Extensive neck calcification is the only independent predictor of persistent type IA endoleak, and an increase in sac size warrants reintervention. These data suggest that select early persistent type IA endoleaks can be safely observed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.096DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

type endoleak
28
type endoleaks
20
persistent type
20
type
12
sac size
12
endoleak
9
select early
8
endoleaks
8
endoleaks endovascular
8
endovascular aneurysm
8

Similar Publications

Endoleak is a significant complication of endovascular aortic repair, associated with adverse long-term outcomes. This review discusses the classification, mechanisms, and imaging diagnosis of endoleaks. Five types of endoleaks are described, each with distinct characteristics and management approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Type II endoleak is the most common complication after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Type II endoleak with aneurysm sac growth is not benign for long-term outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and should be treated to prevent secondary stent graft-related complications and aneurysm rupture. The current consensus is to consider treatments for persistent type II endoleak with significant aneurysm sac growth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preemptive side branch embolization may help prevent type II endoleak, reduce reintervention rates, and promote early aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair. However, evidence of its effectiveness in preventing aneurysm rupture, reducing aneurysm-related mortality, ensuring safety, and maintaining cost-effectiveness is limited. The 2024 European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines do not recommend routine preemptive embolization due to a lack of high-quality evidence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To compare the results of internal iliac artery (IIA) incorporation using balloon-expandable (BESG) versus self-expandable stent grafts (SESG) while using iliac branch devices (IBD) for endovascular repair of aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies up to December 2024 that compared BESG and SESG for IBD during endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: There are many reports of late open conversion after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Herein, we report the case of an octogenarian patient with a giant ovarian tumor who underwent ovarian tumor resection and open conversion with graft replacement simultaneously via laparotomy.

Case Presentation: An 86-year-old woman underwent EVAR 7 years ago.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF