Prediction of need for intervention in posterior urethral valves: Use of urine osmolality.

Aim: Renal tubular dysfunction (RTD) causing obligate production of hypoosmolar urine in boys with posterior urethral valves (PUVs) has been described. It is not known how clinically significant this is. We hypothesize that a feedback loop is present in many PUV boys who suffer deterioration of their lower urinary tract (LUT). RTD results in hypoosmolar urine, obligate polyuria, and bladder stretch-injury. The increasing back-pressure worsens RTD, thus exacerbating the injury. Coexisting renal dysplasia and acquired renal scarring exacerbate this. We compared the concentrating ability (random clinic urine osmolality) of PUV boys who had no LUT deterioration to those who required intervention, examining the confounding effect of renal impairment with a subgroup analysis comparing those with plasma creatinine ≤80μmol/l.

Methods: A retrospective review of our PUV database was performed. Age, intervention, and highest recorded random clinic urine osmolality (>1year) with concurrent plasma creatinine were recorded (normal urine osmolality 500-850 mOsm/kg). Data are given as median values, analyzed by Mann-Whitney u-test, with P<0.05 deemed significant.

Main Results: Urine osmolality was available in 77 boys with PUV out of 125 in our series. Of these, 34 required subsequent intervention (e.g., Mitrofanoff procedure, bladder augmentation). Age at testing trended towards being higher in the intervention group [7.9 (4.3-10.9) years vs. nonintervention 6.3 (4-8.4); P=0.06]. Urine osmolality was significantly reduced in the intervention group [411(293-547) vs. 631 (441-805) mOsm/kg; P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis comparing only those with creatinine ≤80μmol/l was respectively 451 (322-567) mOsm/kg (n=22) vs. 645 (469-810) mOsm/kg (n=40), P<0.01.

Conclusion: This study confirms that hypoosmolar urine is highly associated with progression of LUT dysfunction, requiring intervention. Even boys with normal creatinine values have a greater risk of LUT deterioration if they have a RTD and produce hypoosmolar urine.

Level Of Evidence: IV (retrospective service development project).