A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Shade Sails and Passive Recreation in Public Parks of Melbourne and Denver: A Randomized Intervention. | LitMetric

Shade Sails and Passive Recreation in Public Parks of Melbourne and Denver: A Randomized Intervention.

Am J Public Health

David B. Buller and Mary Klein Buller are with Klein Buendel, Inc., Golden, CO. Dallas R. English is with the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Jody Simmons, Melanie Wakefield, and Suzanne Dobbinson are with the Centre for Beha

Published: December 2017


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: To test whether shade sails will increase the use of passive recreation areas (PRAs).

Methods: We conducted a stratified randomized pretest-posttest controlled design study in Melbourne, Australia, and Denver, Colorado, in 2010 to 2014. We randomized a sample of 144 public parks with 2 PRAs in full sun in a 1:3 ratio to treatment or control. Shade sails were built at 1 PRA per treatment park. The outcome was any use of the study PRA (n = 576 pretest and n = 576 posttest observations; 100% follow-up).

Results: Compared with control PRAs (adjusted probability of use: pretest = 0.14, posttest = 0.17), use of treatment PRAs (pretest = 0.10, posttest = 0.32) was higher at posttest (odds ratio [OR] = 3.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71, 8.94). Shade increased use of PRAs in Denver (control: pretest = 0.18, posttest = 0.19; treatment: pretest = 0.16, posttest = 0.47) more than Melbourne (control: pretest = 0.11, posttest = 0.14; shaded: pretest = 0.06, posttest = 0.19; OR = 2.98; 95% CI = 1.09, 8.14).

Conclusions: Public investment in shade is warranted for skin cancer prevention and may be especially useful in the United States.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02971709.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677545PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304071DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shade sails
12
passive recreation
8
public parks
8
shade
5
sails passive
4
recreation public
4
parks melbourne
4
melbourne denver
4
denver randomized
4
randomized intervention
4

Similar Publications