Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
This study focuses on essentialist beliefs about homosexuality as determinants of discriminatory intentions against gay men and lesbian women (LG) and the readiness to engage in positive action toward them. A sample of 997 exclusively heterosexual adults participated in an online study set in Croatia, a country with high homophobia undergoing social change that threatens the higher status of the heterosexual majority. Beliefs about immutability and universality of homosexuality were associated with less intention to discriminate and more readiness to engage in positive behavior, while discreteness beliefs were inversely related to both. Furthermore, attitudes toward LGs seem to be the mechanism behind the observed links. Results suggest essentialist beliefs might be fuel for attitudes, which are in turn associated with behavioral intentions. Importantly, essentialist beliefs had both indirect (with attitudes as mediators) and direct effects on behavioral intentions speaking in favor of their robust role in explaining LG-related phenomena.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1383104 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Individual belief in a rigid definition of gender underlies significant social costs, from the gender pay gap, violence and discrimination against transgender and gender diverse people, to global economic losses. These beliefs are often rooted in essentialist thinking that gender is distinct, non-overlapping, unchangeable, and biologically based. Gender is a multidimensional social concept, partly informed by perceptions of sex, which is a distinct concept referring to a collection of biological traits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChallenging gender essentialism with animal examples: Reducing children's prejudice toward voice-based gender nonconformity.
J Exp Child Psychol
September 2025
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China; Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Grounded in developmental intergroup theory, which highlights the role of essentialist thinking in the emergence of prejudice, this study examined whether reducing children's gender essentialism could decrease prejudice against speakers with gender-nonconforming (GN) voices. A total of 162 children aged 8-12 years participated in the study. The intervention group (N = 81) received three lessons illustrating diversity in sex-related traits and behaviors in the animal kingdom to challenge essentialist beliefs about gender roles, expression, and biological sex, whereas the control group received comparable lessons without gender-related content.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnstable, indistinct, and cohesive? How group cognitions shape attitudes toward transgender and nonbinary people as a function of gender essentialism.
J Pers Soc Psychol
August 2025
Psychology Program, Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi.
Knowledge of whether and how people think of transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals as constituting gender groups is scarce, but these group cognitions may help explain well-documented prejudice toward these individuals. Given that TGNB individuals defy the traditional gender binary, cisgender perceivers may default to viewing TGNB people as not representing a distinct social group (unlike "men" and "women"), perceive their group membership as unstable, and perceive them as a cohesive (out)group. Across three preregistered studies, we examined these group cognitions and whether they partly explain the connection between strong gender essentialist thinking and negative attitudes toward TGNB people.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGender Essentialism Leads to Biased Learning Opportunities That Shape Women's Career Interests.
Psychol Sci
August 2025
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
Gender differences in occupational interests are often assumed to reflect sex differences in empathizing or systemizing preferences. Do such essentialized explanations lead people to provide gender-biased learning affordances that constrain women's career interests? In Study 1 ( = 292), North American STEM professionals endorsing a biologically essentialized (vs. sociocultural) explanation for gender differences in occupational interests provided women (men) with more empathizing (systemizing) learning affordances in a mock management task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAncestry inferences from DNA testing results: The problem of sociogenetic essentialism.
Hist Philos Life Sci
May 2025
Brain and Cognitive Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Millions of people have now taken DNA ancestry tests, with many of them looking for information about their origins or even their ethnic identity. However, what these tests can only do is allow for a probabilistic estimate of a person's similarity to a reference group. This is often based on research in population genetics that study human genetic variation by identifying ancestry informative markers, that is, DNA markers that are found more often in one population rather than others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF