Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Sci Justice

Principal Forensic Services Ltd, Office 4, 219 Kensington High Street, London W8 6BD, United Kingdom.

Published: September 2017

98%

921

2 minutes

Download full-text PDF	Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.005	DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

reply morrison

morrison 2016

2016 refining

refining relevant

relevant population

population forensic

forensic voice

voice comparison

comparison response

response hicks

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

August 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Sports Med

January 2025

Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance, Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research, Ottawa, Canada.

The study aimed to improve global surveillance of child and adolescent movement behaviors (like physical activity and screen time) by gathering expert opinions through a Delphi method involving 62 participants.
Experts ranked important items in categories like funding, capacity building, and methods, with a consensus on key priorities such as increased public funding and standard protocols for measures.
The findings highlighted common priorities across different income countries and initiatives, but there was no agreement on the use of private funding for surveillance.