98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background Context: In clinical practice, the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy is based on information from the patient's history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Various physical tests may be performed, but their diagnostic accuracy is unknown.
Purpose: This study aimed to summarize and update the evidence on diagnostic performance of tests carried out during a physical examination for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.
Study Design: A review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests was carried out.
Study Sample: The study sample comprised diagnostic studies comparing results of tests performed during a physical examination in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy with a reference standard of imaging or surgical findings.
Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios are presented, together with pooled results for sensitivity and specificity.
Methods: A literature search up to March 2016 was performed in CENTRAL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2.
Results: Five diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. Only Spurling's test was evaluated in more than one study, showing high specificity ranging from 0.89 to 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.00); sensitivity varied from 0.38 to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.21-0.99). No studies were found that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of widely used neurological tests such as key muscle strength, tendon reflexes, and sensory impairments.
Conclusions: There is limited evidence for accuracy of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. When consistent with patient history, clinicians may use a combination of Spurling's, axial traction, and an Arm Squeeze test to increase the likelihood of a cervical radiculopathy, whereas a combined results of four negative neurodynamics tests and an Arm Squeeze test could be used to rule out the disorder.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241 | DOI Listing |
J Int Med Res
September 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Health Sciences University Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Turkey.
ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of bilateral decompression combined with a unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach in centralizing a lordotic cage and preventing contralateral radiculopathy by ensuring equal foraminal elevation.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study based on clinical records and radiological data. Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis at L3-S1 levels underwent bilateral decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2017 and 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA 52-year-old Myanmar man presented with bilateral progressive painless asymmetrical wrist and finger drop in 1 year without any sensory and sphincter problems. He has hypochromic microcytic anemia diagnosed as Hemoglobin E disease before. However, a serial full blood count revealed thrombocytopenia and a drop in hemoglobin disproportionate to HbE disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Nucl Med
August 2025
School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane/Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Background: Animal models of nerve compression have revealed neuroinflammation not only at the entrapment site, but also remotely at the spinal cord. However, there is limited information on the presence of neuroinflammation in human compression neuropathies. The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess which tracer kinetic model most optimally quantified [C]DPA713 uptake in the spinal cord and neuroforamina in patients with painful cervical radiculopathy, (2) evaluate the performance of linearized methods (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
August 2025
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed I University, Oujda, MAR.
This case report describes the functional outcomes of a proprioceptive rehabilitation protocol for primary prevention in a 31-year-old patient with L5-S1 radiculopathy sequelae confirmed by electroneuromyography and associated ankle proprioceptive deficit. The patient underwent a seven-week proprioceptive rehabilitation protocol comprising 10 supervised sessions, with a six-month follow-up period. Assessment tools included the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the single-leg balance test with eyes closed, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for perceived stability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosurg Spine
September 2025
22Department of Neurosurgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Objective: Variations exist among surgeons in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (LDH), generating major issues in decision-making models. The authors aimed to identify international nuances in surgical treatment patterns, highlight the differences in responses in each country group and different treatment trends across countries, and identify factors that influence surgical decisions.
Methods: An online survey with preformulated answers was submitted to 292 orthopedic surgeons and 223 neurosurgeons from 16 countries regarding 3 clinical vignettes (recurrence without low back pain, recurrence with severe low back pain, and recurrence with 2-level disc disease).