98%
921
2 minutes
20
Automated serum heavy + light chain (HLC) immunoassays can measure the intact immunoglobulins of each light chain type separately. We though to compare HLC assays with electrophoretic techniques in determining International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. 114 myeloma patients from 2 trials were included. HLC measurements were made utilizing archived sera and response assessments compared with those based on electrophoretic analysis at the time of the trials. Assessments at ∼90 days and maximal response were compared as was the power of the 2 techniques for predicting later responses, overall survival, and progression. The kappa statistic indicated good agreement between the 2 methods for determining IMWG response criteria, although HLC measurements might give better predictions of subsequent responses and frequently gave an earlier indication of change. HLC measurements could represent an alternative to electrophoretic techniques in determining IMWG response. Validation with a greater range of patient responses is needed for confirmation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1339876 | DOI Listing |
Background: Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains difficult to treat despite advances in therapy. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, such as idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), have improved outcomes, yet many patients relapse within a year. Current International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria for deep response require prolonged observation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBlood Adv
August 2025
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
Bone disease represents a hallmark feature of multiple myeloma (MM), affecting nearly all patients during the disease course. Morphological imaging techniques play a crucial role in detecting bone disease, whereas functional ones are in addition fundamental for differentiation of active from inactive disease and prognostic stratification. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) currently recommends whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) as the first-choice imaging technique for the diagnosis of bone disease, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended in cases without further myeloma-defining events.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
July 2025
Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Background: Studies have suggested a synergism between lenalidomide (LEN) and ibrutinib (IBR) in multiple myeloma (MM). Both downregulate IRF4, a key target and master transcriptional factor regulating myeloma cell survival.
Method: A 3 + 3 phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IBR in combination with LEN + dexamethasone (DEX) in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM who had at least one prior line of therapy.
Blood Cancer J
August 2025
Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Uniform assessment of response to treatment is crucial to managing multiple myeloma (MM) and developing new therapies. Measurement of monoclonal protein forms the cornerstone of disease assessment in MM. According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines, serum-free light chain (sFLC) is included in MM response assessment in patients with no measurable disease by electrophoresis and to define stringent complete response.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiscov Oncol
May 2025
Department of Hematology, Hematology Research Center of Yunnan Province, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650000, China.
Unlabelled: ABS: OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performance of three large language models (LLMs)-ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Open AI-o1-in addressing clinical questions related to Programmed Cell Death in multiple myeloma. By evaluating each model's accuracy, comprehensiveness, and self-correcting capabilities, the investigation sought to determine the most effective tool for supporting clinical decision-making in this specialized oncological context.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF