98%
921
2 minutes
20
The current reference standard for unstable ankle fractures is open reduction and internal fixation using a plate and lag screws. This approach requires extensive dissection and wound complications are not uncommon. The use of intramedullary screw fixation might overcome these issues. The aim of our study was to provide an overview of the published data regarding intramedullary screw fixation of fibula fractures combined with a small consecutive case series. We performed a search of published studies to identify the studies in which fibula fractures were treated with percutaneous intramedullary screw fixation. Additionally, all consecutive patients treated for an unstable ankle fracture in a level 1 trauma center using an intramedullary screw were retrospectively included. The literature search identified 6 studies with a total of 180 patients. Wound infection was seen in 1 patient (0.6%), anatomic reduction was achieved in 168 patients (93.3%), and a loss of reduction was seen in 2 patients (1.1%). Implant removal was deemed necessary in 3 patients (1.7%) and nonunion was seen is 2 patients (1.1%). A total of 11 patients, in whom no wound complications occurred, were included in our study. The follow-up duration was a minimum of 12 months. A secondary dislocation was seen in 1 patient, and delayed union was observed after 7.5 months in 1 other patient. In conclusion, intramedullary screw fixation is a safe and adequate method to use for fibula fractures, with a low risk of wound complications. Additional research regarding functional outcome is warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.024 | DOI Listing |
Injury
September 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hangzhou Xiaoshan Traditional Chinese Medical Orthopedic Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of nail dynamization in patients with delayed union and nonunion of femur and tibia shaft fractures following intramedullary nailing, and systematically analyze the associated factors to guide surgeons.
Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify relevant studies. We screened the literature based on the eligibility criteria, extracted relevant data, and assessed the quality of the included studies.
J Orthop Trauma
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Objectives: To compare time, fluoroscopic utilization, and number of misses for placement of far interlocking screws in tibial and femoral nails using a targeting arm (Targeter) versus perfect circle technique (Control).
Methods Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Single-center, large, urban, level 1 trauma center.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
September 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare reoperation rates and additional clinical outcomes among three methods of olecranon osteotomy fixation: intramedullary screw (IMS), tension band wire (TBW), and plate fixation (PF).
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all AO/OTA class 13 distal humerus fractures treated at a single academic Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2005, and July 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria included patients treated using an olecranon osteotomy fixed via IMS, TBW, or PF.
OTA Int
September 2025
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
Objectives: Orthopaedic surgeons are at risk of occupational, noise-induced hearing loss due to exposure to instruments in the operating room. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic trauma procedures exceed recommended decibel (dB) limits. The secondary objective was to demonstrate which actions during a case create the highest sound levels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
July 2025
Medicine and Surgery, Hamdard University, Karachi, PAK.
Advancements in fracture fixation have significantly reshaped orthopedic trauma management by improving mechanical stability and promoting biological healing. This retrospective observational study assessed clinical and biomechanical outcomes in 500 patients who underwent surgical fixation for radiologically confirmed fractures. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group A received conventional fixation methods (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF