Article Synopsis

  • Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy improves survival rates in melanoma patients with node-positive intermediate-thickness melanomas, but the role of follow-up completion lymph-node dissection remains uncertain.
  • In a study with nearly 2,000 patients, immediate completion lymph-node dissection did not significantly improve melanoma-specific survival compared to monitoring with ultrasonography, showing similar survival rates in both groups after 3 years.
  • While the dissection group had a slightly higher disease-free survival rate, it also faced a greater risk of complications like lymphedema, indicating the need for careful consideration when choosing treatment options.

Video Abstracts
Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy is associated with increased melanoma-specific survival (i.e., survival until death from melanoma) among patients with node-positive intermediate-thickness melanomas (1.2 to 3.5 mm). The value of completion lymph-node dissection for patients with sentinel-node metastases is not clear.

Methods: In an international trial, we randomly assigned patients with sentinel-node metastases detected by means of standard pathological assessment or a multimarker molecular assay to immediate completion lymph-node dissection (dissection group) or nodal observation with ultrasonography (observation group). The primary end point was melanoma-specific survival. Secondary end points included disease-free survival and the cumulative rate of nonsentinel-node metastasis.

Results: Immediate completion lymph-node dissection was not associated with increased melanoma-specific survival among 1934 patients with data that could be evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis or among 1755 patients in the per-protocol analysis. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (±SE) 3-year rate of melanoma-specific survival was similar in the dissection group and the observation group (86±1.3% and 86±1.2%, respectively; P=0.42 by the log-rank test) at a median follow-up of 43 months. The rate of disease-free survival was slightly higher in the dissection group than in the observation group (68±1.7% and 63±1.7%, respectively; P=0.05 by the log-rank test) at 3 years, based on an increased rate of disease control in the regional nodes at 3 years (92±1.0% vs. 77±1.5%; P<0.001 by the log-rank test); these results must be interpreted with caution. Nonsentinel-node metastases, identified in 11.5% of the patients in the dissection group, were a strong, independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.78; P=0.005). Lymphedema was observed in 24.1% of the patients in the dissection group and in 6.3% of those in the observation group.

Conclusions: Immediate completion lymph-node dissection increased the rate of regional disease control and provided prognostic information but did not increase melanoma-specific survival among patients with melanoma and sentinel-node metastases. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; MSLT-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297895 .).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548388PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613210DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

melanoma-specific survival
16
completion lymph-node
12
lymph-node dissection
12
dissection group
12
observation group
12
associated increased
8
increased melanoma-specific
8
patients sentinel-node
8
sentinel-node metastases
8
disease-free survival
8

Similar Publications

Background: Interest in evaluating neoadjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIB/IIC melanoma is growing, but studies assessing long-term outcomes generally report data based on pathologic stage after sentinel lymph node microstaging. This study therefore aimed to characterize real-world recurrence patterns and survival specifically in clinical stage IIB/IIC melanoma to contextualize outcomes for selection of patients to undergo neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients who received a diagnosis of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth-edition clinical stage IIB/IIC cutaneous melanoma from 2006 to 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Inadequacy of testing for melanoma BRAF status results in delayed access to systemic therapy. BRAF mutations and their association with patient/tumour characteristics and survival is poorly understood.

Objectives: To report national data from England on the (1) frequency of molecular BRAF testing, (2) association of patient/tumour characteristics with BRAF mutations and (3) treatment received and survival of patients with BRAF mutations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Melanoma In Situ.

JAMA Dermatol

September 2025

First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Importance: The overdiagnosis of melanoma in situ (MIS) is well documented. There is limited evidence on the rate of local recurrence of the non-lentigo maligna (non-LM)/non-acral lentiginous melanoma (non-ALM) subtypes.

Objective: To investigate local recurrence and prognosis in non-LM/non-ALM MIS, the histopathological clearance of the excisional biopsy margins, and the association with the size of wide excision margins.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved melanoma-specific survival (MSS), particularly in patients with tumors with a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) or mutation. In the adjuvant setting, ICIs significantly improve relapse-free survival (RFS), but data on MSS are still lacking. Tissue samples from 83 patients with stage IIIC/D/IV melanoma who started adjuvant ICI between March 2018 and September 2019 were examined using a 700 gene panel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Melanoma is one of the most serious skin cancers worldwide, often progressing without obvious symptoms. Early detection is crucial to enable timely intervention, reducing morbidity and mortality. However, no standardized high-throughput test exists for non-invasive melanoma detection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF