A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Interfang Distances of Rattlesnakes: Sexual, Interspecific, and Body Size-related Variation, and Implications for Snakebite Research and Management. | LitMetric

Interfang Distances of Rattlesnakes: Sexual, Interspecific, and Body Size-related Variation, and Implications for Snakebite Research and Management.

Wilderness Environ Med

Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA (Drs Hayes, Corbit, and Herbert, and Mr Cardwell); Department of Biology, Pacific Union College, Angwin, CA (Dr Herbert).

Published: June 2017


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Snakebite severity corresponds to size of snake because the amount of venom a snake injects is positively associated with snake size. Because fang marks are often present on snakebite patients, we tested whether the relationship between snake length and distance between fang puncture wounds can be generalized for rattlesnakes of genus Crotalus.

Methods: We measured 2 interfang distances from 79 rattlesnakes of both sexes, 5 species, and varying body length: 1) distance between fang bases in anesthetized snakes, and 2) distance between fang punctures in a membrane-covered beaker bitten defensively.

Results: Statistical analyses supported our 2 hypotheses, that 1) body size-related fang divergence during fang protraction (ie, anterolateral movement during fang erection), and 2) the relationship between snake length and interfang distance are similar between the sexes and among different rattlesnake species. We therefore derived a general equation to estimate snake length based on distance between fang marks, and recommended 5 snake size categories: very small (<10 mm), small (10-15 mm), medium (15-20 mm), large (20-25 mm), and very large (>25 mm).

Conclusions: The distance between fang marks on a snakebite patient may be used to estimate the size or size category of the offending snake, which in some cases may have predictive value for overall clinical severity of a given envenomation. Assessing interfang distance from puncture wounds can improve snakebite research and anticipation of snakebite severity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2017.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distance fang
20
fang marks
12
snake length
12
fang
9
interfang distances
8
distances rattlesnakes
8
body size-related
8
snakebite severity
8
snake
8
snake size
8

Similar Publications