98%
921
2 minutes
20
Red-light-running (RLR) emerges as a major cause that may lead to intersection-related crashes and endanger intersection safety. To reduce RLR violations, it's critical to identify the influential factors associated with RLR and estimate RLR frequency. Without resorting to video camera recordings, this study investigates this important issue by utilizing high-resolution traffic and signal event data collected from loop detectors at five intersections on Trunk Highway 55, Minneapolis, MN. First, a simple method is proposed to identify RLR by fully utilizing the information obtained from stop bar detectors, downstream entrance detectors and advance detectors. Using 12 months of event data, a total of 6550 RLR cases were identified. According to a definition of RLR frequency as the conditional probability of RLR on a certain traffic or signal condition (veh/1000veh), the relationships between RLR frequency and some influential factors including arriving time at advance detector, approaching speed, headway, gap to the preceding vehicle on adjacent lane, cycle length, geometric characteristics and even snowing weather were empirically investigated. Statistical analysis shows good agreement with the traffic engineering practice, e.g., RLR is most likely to occur on weekdays during peak periods under large traffic demands and longer signal cycles, and a total of 95.24% RLR events occurred within the first 1.5s after the onset of red phase. The findings confirmed that vehicles tend to run the red light when they are close to intersection during phase transition, and the vehicles following the leading vehicle with short headways also likely run the red light. Last, a simplified nonlinear regression model is proposed to estimate RLR frequency based on the data from advance detector. The study is expected to helpbetter understand RLR occurrence and further contribute to the future improvement of intersection safety.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.010 | DOI Listing |
Updates Surg
September 2025
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Background And Objectives: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been linked to several advantages compared to open approach, but the actual benefit of robotic liver resection (RLR) over LLR in HCC needs further investigation.
Methods: We performed a multicentric propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis comparing perioperative and oncologic outcomes of LLR vs. RLR for HCC.
Updates Surg
September 2025
Unit of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, 70021, Bari, Italy.
Obesity poses unique challenges in liver surgery, potentially affecting perioperative outcomes. While laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has demonstrated clear benefits over open surgery, evidence regarding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on robotic liver resection (RLR) outcomes remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the influence of BMI on perioperative outcomes following RLR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Surg
August 2025
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Background: The technical advantages of robotic platforms may facilitate minimally invasive liver resections, improving outcomes over the laparoscopic approach. This meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes of robotic liver resection (RLR) versus laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).
Materials And Methods: A systematic literature search identified matched cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing RLR and LLR from 2003 to 2024.
Eur J Surg Oncol
September 2025
Augusta-Klinikum Bochum Mitte, Clinic for General, Visceral and Robotic Surgery, Bochum, Germany.
Introduction: Resecting liver surgery has been dominated by open surgical approaches (OLR). Minimal invasive procedures such as robotic liver surgery (RLR) are technically challenging but may reduce the surgical trauma and complication rates.
Objectives & Methods: This study aims to compare the outcomes of RLR and OLR.
J Robot Surg
April 2025
Department of Urology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Langzhong, Sichuan Province, China.
This meta-analysis evaluates and contrasts the diagnosis and perioperative results involving RLR (robotic liver resection) and open OLR (open liver resection). The researcher used systematic search criteria of databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature published between January 2000 and January 2025. Eight non-randomized controlled trials were included, each using propensity score matching (PSM), involving 1192 patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF