A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arch Gynecol Obstet

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijng Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.

Published: May 2017


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia.

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six.

Results: The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6-98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9-92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2-98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4-96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0-8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7-39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3-47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0-17.6%) for late onset patients.

Conclusion: The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4302-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

onset preeclampsia
16
late onset
16
systematic review
8
sensitivity cutoff-sen
8
specificity cutoff-spe
8
early onset
8
early late
8
preeclampsia pooled
8
equivocal zone
8
onset
6

Similar Publications