Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The effective non-invasive identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its proper referral for invasive treatment are still unresolved issues. We evaluated our quantification of myocardium at risk (MAR) from our second generation 3D MPI/CTA fusion framework for the detection and localization of obstructive coronary disease.
Methods: Studies from 48 patients who had rest/stress MPI, CTA, and ICA were analyzed from 3 different institutions. From the CTA, a 3D biventricular surface of the myocardium with superimposed coronaries was extracted and fused to the perfusion distribution. Significant lesions were identified from CTA readings and positioned on the fused display. Three estimates of MAR were computed on the 3D LV surface on the basis of the MPI alone (MAR), the CTA alone (MAR), and the fused information (MAR). The extents of areas at risk were used to generate ROC curves using ICA anatomical findings as reference standard.
Results: Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for CAD detection using MAR was 0.88 (CI = 0.75-0.95) and for MAR and MAR were, respectively 0.82 (CI = 0.69-0.92) and 0.75 (CI = 0.60-0.86) using the ≥70% stenosis criterion. AUCs for CAD localization (all vessels) using MAR showed significantly higher performance than either MAR or MAR or both.
Conclusions: Using ICA as the reference standard, MAR as the quantitative parameter, and AUC to measure diagnostic performance, MPI-CTA fusion imaging provided incremental diagnostic information compared to MPI or CTA alone for the diagnosis and localization of CAD.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0819-x | DOI Listing |