A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Recording the human brainstem frequency-following-response in the free-field. | LitMetric

Recording the human brainstem frequency-following-response in the free-field.

J Neurosci Methods

International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS www.brams.org), Outremont, QC, Canada; Center for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM crblm.ca), Montreal, QC, Canada; University of Montreal, Psychology Department, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology Head &

Published: March 2017


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The human auditory brainstem frequency-following response (FFR) is an objective measure used to investigate the brainstem's encoding ability of sounds. Traditionally, FFRs are recorded under close-field conditions (earphones), but free-field stimulations (loudspeaker) have yet to be attempted, which would increase the applications of FFRs by making this technique accessible to those who cannot wear inserted transducers. Here we test the feasibility and reliability of measuring speech ABRs across free and close-field.

New Method: The FFR was evoked by a 40-ms consonant-vowel (cv) /da/ syllable which was presented in the standard close-field conditions with insert earphones, and in a novel free-field condition via a loudspeaker.

Results: A well-defined FFR was observed for each stimulating method (free or close-field). We show that it is possible and reliable to elicit FFRs from a speaker and that these do not systematically differ from those elicited by conventional earphones.

Comparison With Existing Method: Neural responses were subjected to a comparative within-subjects analysis, using standard measures found in the literature in order to quantify and compare the intrinsic (amplitude, noise, consistency), acoustic (latency, spectral amplitude) and reliability properties (intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland and Altman limits of agreement) of the neural signal.

Conclusions: Reliable FFRs can be elicited using free-field presentation with comparable to acoustical, intrinsic and reliability properties as those elicited by standard close-field presentations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.01.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

close-field conditions
8
standard close-field
8
reliability properties
8
recording human
4
human brainstem
4
brainstem frequency-following-response
4
free-field
4
frequency-following-response free-field
4
free-field background
4
background human
4

Similar Publications