A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

How Often the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Should be Checked for Calibration Error? | LitMetric

How Often the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Should be Checked for Calibration Error?

J Glaucoma

*VST Glaucoma Center, Dr. Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad †GMR Varalakshmi Campus, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh ‡L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Published: November 2016


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the frequency of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) calibration error (CE) check.

Methods: One observer at each of the 3 tertiary care ophthalmic centers was involved. The tonometers were checked at baseline for CE. A tonometer was defined as faulty when CE exceeded 2 mm Hg at any testing level. Faulty GATs were repaired in-house. Subsequent CE check was done once per month for 6 months. GATs were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (G1)≤1 year, group 2 (G2)>1 to 10 years, and group 3 (G3)>10 years of usage.

Results: In total, 76 slit-lamp mounted GATs were included. The number of GATs in groups 1 to 3 was 19, 36, and 21, respectively. Seven (9.2%) tonometers were faulty at the baseline. None in G1, 5 in G2, and 16 in G3 demonstrated unacceptable CE over the study course (P<0.01). The survival function of G1 tonometers was 1.0 throughout, whereas that (95% confidence interval) of the G2 and G3 tonometers were 0.97 (0.81-0.99) and 0.76 (0.51-0.89) at 1 month, and 0.86 (0.69-0.93) and 0.23 (0.08-0.43) at 6 months, respectively. The probability of CE development increased with increasing age of the tonometer. The frequency of use of the tonometer was not associated with the development of CE (odds ratio=1.00).

Conclusions: CE occurs more frequently in older tonometers. Although newer GATs (<1 y old) can be checked twice yearly, GATs older than a year should be checked at least monthly.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000545DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

goldmann applanation
8
applanation tonometer
8
tonometer checked
4
checked calibration
4
calibration error?
4
error? purpose
4
purpose evaluate
4
evaluate frequency
4
frequency goldmann
4
tonometer gat
4

Similar Publications