A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A Simplified (Screening) Approach to Check the Calibration Status of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. | LitMetric

A Simplified (Screening) Approach to Check the Calibration Status of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.

J Glaucoma

*VST Glaucoma Centre, Dr Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana †GMR Varalakshmi Campus, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh ‡L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Published: October 2016


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: To investigate whether a lower-end calibration error check alone can identify a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with acceptable calibration error as per Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society (APGS) and World Glaucoma Association (WGA) guidelines.

Methods: This was a multicentric prospective study in a tertiary eye-care institutional setting. Seventy-six slit-lamp-mounted Haag-Streit GATs (Model AT 900 C/M) were included in the study. All GATs were checked for calibration error at 0, 20, and 60 mm Hg testing levels as recommended by the manufacturer. The ability of 2 screening criteria (calibration error within ±1 or ±2 mm Hg, respectively, at the 0 mm Hg testing level without using the calibration error check weight bar) to identify a tonometer within acceptable calibration limits defined by APGS (calibration error within ±2, ±3, and ±4 mm Hg at 0, 20, and 60 mm Hg testing levels, respectively) and WGA (calibration error within ±1 mm Hg at all testing levels) was determined.

Main Outcome Measure: The negative likelihood ratio of the screening criteria RESULTS:: Five (6.6%) and 42 (55%) GATs were outside of the APGS and the WGA calibration limits, respectively. Negative likelihood ratios of the first and the second screening criteria at the APGS definition of calibration error tolerance were 0.11 and 0.25, respectively, and at that of the WGA definition of calibration error tolerance were 0.38 and 0.90, respectively.

Conclusions: The screening criteria of calibration error within ±1 mm Hg at the 0 mm Hg testing level seem to be clinically useful to detect GAT with an acceptable calibration error as per the APGS guideline.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000426DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

calibration error
44
screening criteria
16
calibration
14
acceptable calibration
12
testing levels
12
error ±1
12
error
11
goldmann applanation
8
applanation tonometer
8
error check
8

Similar Publications