98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Missed colonoscopy appointments (no-shows) can lead to wasted resources and delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis, an area of special concern in public health systems that often provide care for vulnerable patients. Our objective was to identify reasons for missed colonoscopy appointments in patients seeking care at two large public health systems in Houston, TX.
Methods: We conducted a telephone survey of patients who missed their colonoscopy appointments at two tertiary care health systems. Using a structured survey instrument, we collected information on patient-specific and health services barriers. Patient-specific barriers included perceived procedural-related factors (e.g., difficulty in preparation), cognitive-emotional factors (e.g., fear or concern about modesty), and changes in health status (e.g., improvement or worsening of health). Health services barriers included logistical factors (e.g., travel-related difficulties) and appointment scheduling problems (inconvenient date or time). We examined differences in attributions for missed appointments between the two study sites.
Results: Of 160 unique patients (102 Site A and 58 Site B) who missed their appointment during the study period, 153 (95.6 %) attributed their no-show to at least one of the listed barriers. Most respondents (125; 78.1 %) cited travel-related issues or scheduling problems as reasons for their missed appointment. Not having a ride or a travel companion was the most commonly reported travel-related issue. We also found significant differences for barriers between the two sites.
Conclusions: Most missed colonoscopy appointments resulted from potentially preventable travel- and scheduling-related issues. Because barriers to keeping colonoscopy appointments are different across health systems, each health system might need to develop unique interventions to reduce missed colonoscopy appointments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4096-3 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Open Gastroenterol
August 2025
School of Health and Life Science, University of the West of Scotland, South Lanarkshire, UK.
Objective: To establish patients' perceptions of decision-making and prioritisation of test attributes when considering a colonic investigation.
Methods: National Health Service Highland patients on the waiting list for a colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and colonoscopy were invited to undergo a semistructured qualitative telephone interview. A diverse sample was sought using a purposive sampling strategy, aiming for differences in age, gender and test awaited between participants.
BMC Health Serv Res
August 2025
Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Background: Over the past decade, many well-resourced health plans and systems surpassed the 80% colorectal cancer screening rate goal, while lower resource environments such as federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) lag behind. FQHCs in rural areas are especially challenged with limited resources to reach diverse patients who often lack consistent engagement with clinical care. mHealth solutions, like mPATHCRC, can address these challenges by automating tasks and expanding patient outreach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
July 2025
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Introduction: Traditional colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes in China face two major challenges: low screening coverage and poor adherence. Mobile health shows promise for cancer prevention, and a WeChat-based intelligent tool has been developed to support full-cycle CRC screening, including risk assessment, individualised screening recommendation, appointment management, result processing and health education. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of this tool-based screening strategy in a multicentre, prospective cohort.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Prim Care
July 2025
Center for Health Information and Communication, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, , Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13 416, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Background: In several Western nations, cancers of the colon and rectum have been steadily increasing in persons younger than age 50. Although the age at which to begin colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Gen Intern Med
July 2025
Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a HEDIS measure in value-based care (VBC), but the screening rate among patients in VBC is suboptimal.
Objective: To increase CRC screening through home-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT) among patients in VBC.
Design: Observational study.